- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 54,317
And as much as the committee says the timing of losses doesn’t matter, it does. ND lost early. With a freshman QB, so the narrative writes itself.
ND IS a good team and worthy of a playoff spot imo. But head to head should matter. Miami shouldn’t be 18, but bad losses at bad times (including a stand alone game on a Friday night with everyone watching) and here we are.
I heard someone say the committee only ranks teams 3 at a time. Meaning rank 1,2 & 3. Then move on to 4,5&6. And head to head only gets discussed if the teams are in the same bucket. They said that on either the cover 3 podcast or the orange bowl boys. Can’t recall which.
Regardless, ND losing opens up an at-large spot that is ours for the taking if we can win out. So hail Pitt.
They only COMPARE three teams at a time. Which, of course, is not what their mission-statement and by-laws say, but whatever.
I understand comparing Teams 1-3, they are all undefeated. But they should then compare THE NEXT FIVE teams, all of whom have 1-loss. The CFP's own description of their role is to compare "similarly situated" teams. Not "every 3 teams".
Compare the undefeated teams. Rank them.
Compare the next 5 teams that have 1-loss. Rank them.
Next, move to the 2-loss teams (including weak 1-loss teams like BYU). Rank them.
It really isn't that difficult. The "every 3 teams" bull**** is just ridiculous.
"Dear lord, please smite down the 7 teams directly ahead of Miami in the polls."
Simple.