We are poor yet rich

Advertisement
Who's got whats actually written in the article about Miami?
Screenshot_20250715_165505_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165549_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165608_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165628_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165642_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165806_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165835_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165846_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165902_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165913_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165928_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165938_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165947_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_165956_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_170021_On3.jpg
Screenshot_20250715_170033_On3.jpg
 
Not buying that it's anywhere near that kind of number
Who knows ... an INCENTIVE BASED agreement could have those numbers if he passes for 4000 yards, has 40 TD's, 6 INT's and Miami makes the playoffs after winning the ACC.
 
Who knows ... an INCENTIVE BASED agreement could have those numbers if he passes for 4000 yards, has 40 TD's, 6 INT's and Miami makes the playoffs after winning the ACC.
NIL is not allowed to be incentive based so are they saying that rev share is gonna make up that couple million gap?

I guess that’s rhetorical since that has to be what they’re saying
 
Advertisement
Back
Top