- Joined
- Apr 22, 2017
- Messages
- 21,880
Happiness is a room without a roof….
Happiness is a room without a roof….
****, if you have some eligibility maybe you’re our portal solution.Assuming the ***gies didn't actually test that I can't throw a football, I could have done what Beck did today.
He was very poor - we won in spite of him. We've won because of him this season too - that's the trade off.
I cannot throw a football. They wouldn't even let me throw the football when we we doing DB drills at a UK University.****, if you have some eligibility maybe you’re our portal solution.
Then maybe Oklahoma will be interested.I cannot throw a football.
You can tell pretty early how he is going to play. It’s usually good or bad. Not bad then turns it around. When he is off he is off. It’s mentalBeck had a horrific game. Terrible. If he plays like this at OSU we will lose.
Thank god for Fletcher and Toney. And a pretty good defensive outing
We must play 100% better next week.
Please Fletcher 30 carries. Up the gut. Running outside didn’t work today and the screens?
I legit said the keys to the game this week were limiting Reed scrambling and Beck not throwing more than 1 int. Everything else will take care of itself if we do those.If he can just be a game manager and not turn it over the rest of the way, we can win it all. First playoff appearance and a win. Yes a good return on investment.
I mean...friends.35-5 as a starter.
There are few candidates that won this game and Beck isn’t one of them.He won a playoff game… so yes? But we’ll need him to definitely make some throws eventually Ohio state ain’t gonna let us run down their throat they’ll just reload the box with run blitzes and we’ll see again what we did in the middle of the season
Was the QB that won a college football playoff game a good ROI?Sitting in my couch and reflecting about how we handled business in college station. But one thought that lingers was Beck a good ROI. Quickly I can say No, since he has not been as attractive as Ward, and today Beck demonstrated that he will not be the magician that Ward was.
From the flip side, he did not lose us the game or was a negative impact on the totality of the game, but we did invest 4.5 million.
Ultimately, the $4.5 million question comes down to how you define value in the modern NIL era. If the goal was relevance, momentum, and signaling Miami’s willingness to spend like a national contender, the investment largely delivered. If the goal was immediate, unquestioned dominance, the verdict is far less clear.
In today’s college football landscape, big bets are unavoidable. Whether this one was truly “worth it” may not be fully answered until we see what Miami builds next—because the price tag wasn’t just for a quarterback, but for the direction of the program.
Anyways, excited and grateful for The U!
This has to be sarcasmSitting in my couch and reflecting about how we handled business in college station. But one thought that lingers was Beck a good ROI. Quickly I can say No, since he has not been as attractive as Ward, and today Beck demonstrated that he will not be the magician that Ward was.
From the flip side, he did not lose us the game or was a negative impact on the totality of the game, but we did invest 4.5 million.
Ultimately, the $4.5 million question comes down to how you define value in the modern NIL era. If the goal was relevance, momentum, and signaling Miami’s willingness to spend like a national contender, the investment largely delivered. If the goal was immediate, unquestioned dominance, the verdict is far less clear.
In today’s college football landscape, big bets are unavoidable. Whether this one was truly “worth it” may not be fully answered until we see what Miami builds next—because the price tag wasn’t just for a quarterback, but for the direction of the program.
Anyways, excited and grateful for The U!
can't make the call ... we still got another gameSitting in my couch and reflecting about how we handled business in college station. But one thought that lingers was Beck a good ROI. Quickly I can say No, since he has not been as attractive as Ward, and today Beck demonstrated that he will not be the magician that Ward was.
From the flip side, he did not lose us the game or was a negative impact on the totality of the game, but we did invest 4.5 million.
Ultimately, the $4.5 million question comes down to how you define value in the modern NIL era. If the goal was relevance, momentum, and signaling Miami’s willingness to spend like a national contender, the investment largely delivered. If the goal was immediate, unquestioned dominance, the verdict is far less clear.
In today’s college football landscape, big bets are unavoidable. Whether this one was truly “worth it” may not be fully answered until we see what Miami builds next—because the price tag wasn’t just for a quarterback, but for the direction of the program.
Anyways, excited and grateful for The U!