HerbieDaGawd
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2,012
Let's have a hypothetical scenario play out. Which would you rather have happen and why?
Curious to see people's thoughts on this.
- In scenario 1 we have to retain Manny Diaz until the end of his contract (which won't be renewed), this way the program stagnates, we lose recruiting classes, etc, BUT Manny will have no buyout to worry about and we can (hypothetically) reduce Mario's buyout. Granted yes, he could get a contract extension at any time, but let that just play out in your choice. If not Mario, whichever big name coach you guys want can be swapped in.
- In scenario 2 we let go of Manny Diaz during the season, promote Simpson/Lashlee/T Rob or whoever to Interim HC to finish the season. But we make a Billy Napier type hire that is announced around the bowl season. Maybe he does well in the following years, or maybe he is just a perennial 8-4 type HC. Do you want to take this gamble?
Curious to see people's thoughts on this.