LeanMeanOrangeGreen
Freshman
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2025
- Messages
- 192
I can’t seem to get over how these assclowns continue to be pampered and overhyped by the CFP and E$ECPN talking dopes despite having two losses and beating absolutely no one in the realm of respectability. We all know there’s an SEC bias but this is bias on steroids. These bums got plowed by Alabama and Texas (don’t let the final score fool you) and are likely going to sneak into an at-large CFP spot with only 3-4 weeks to go. Why? Because last night they barely beat a coach-less 4-5 Auburn team in OT and will move up a bunch of spots because of it.
If we beat NC State next week in OT, does anyone think we’d be jumping any teams? If anything they might move us back a spot or two. One of our esteemed E$ECPN commentators Louis Riddick said last night how we need to beat everyone on our remaining schedule by 30+ points in order to be considered for an at-large playoff bid. His SEC vibrating butt plug was giving him a special tickle as he constantly criticized us and our 2 “terrible no good very bad losses”. **** him and all these other E$ECPN douche bags.
Now back to Vanderbilt. The most frustrating part might be the fact that these E$ECPN simping simpletons have the audacity to claim there’s no $EC bias of any kind. We can point to a number of overhyped $EC Good Ole Boy programs currently occupying Top 10-15 rankings who are over ranked like Texas, Oklahoma, even Ole Miss and Alabama but Vanderbilt is historic $EC simping amongst the likes we’ve never seen. No one they’ve beaten is currently ranked. They have 2 losses, one of those being a blowout loss to another 2 loss Texas, yet somehow, someway, week in week out, they occupy a Top 10-15 spot in the rankings. I really want to hear an explanation from the E$ECPN simping simpletons. What’s their argument? Why do they sit ahead of several 1-2 loss teams with far better resumes and yes that includes Miami who has 2 wins over 2 currently ranked teams (USF will be back in the Top 25). Because they lost 2 games to Alabama and Texas? Since when do we rank teams based on how good their losses are? Have they actually watched Vanderbilt play? I have and they routinely and physically get pushed around by weaker competition. Nothing about them screams playoff team other than the $EC patch they wear on their uniforms.
If we beat NC State next week in OT, does anyone think we’d be jumping any teams? If anything they might move us back a spot or two. One of our esteemed E$ECPN commentators Louis Riddick said last night how we need to beat everyone on our remaining schedule by 30+ points in order to be considered for an at-large playoff bid. His SEC vibrating butt plug was giving him a special tickle as he constantly criticized us and our 2 “terrible no good very bad losses”. **** him and all these other E$ECPN douche bags.
Now back to Vanderbilt. The most frustrating part might be the fact that these E$ECPN simping simpletons have the audacity to claim there’s no $EC bias of any kind. We can point to a number of overhyped $EC Good Ole Boy programs currently occupying Top 10-15 rankings who are over ranked like Texas, Oklahoma, even Ole Miss and Alabama but Vanderbilt is historic $EC simping amongst the likes we’ve never seen. No one they’ve beaten is currently ranked. They have 2 losses, one of those being a blowout loss to another 2 loss Texas, yet somehow, someway, week in week out, they occupy a Top 10-15 spot in the rankings. I really want to hear an explanation from the E$ECPN simping simpletons. What’s their argument? Why do they sit ahead of several 1-2 loss teams with far better resumes and yes that includes Miami who has 2 wins over 2 currently ranked teams (USF will be back in the Top 25). Because they lost 2 games to Alabama and Texas? Since when do we rank teams based on how good their losses are? Have they actually watched Vanderbilt play? I have and they routinely and physically get pushed around by weaker competition. Nothing about them screams playoff team other than the $EC patch they wear on their uniforms.
Last edited: