HitStick2620
Redshirt Freshman
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,123
But if the OL plays the way it does none of that matters. You can't get **** until you conquer the basics, and I think that's what holds back "Richt's playbook". That said, Richt does some **** blocking schemes like the play where we “trapped” their DT with Gauthier and pulled Brevin.
It's easy to say Richt needs to scheme things up, the way most lay people do, but after this meticulous breakdown where you demonstrate glaring repetitive execution errors by the OL that would limit any play-caller, I'm just surprised you'd fall back into the superficial motion/scheme/we need an OC narrative because every play doesn't work to perfection. It seems like the nature of "upon further review" is to gently show lay folk the nuances so they understand "execution will make most plays work".
Your argument works both ways. You're saying he can't open the playbook because execution on the OL is bad, but it's bad on the most basic of plays he runs as well. Wilson and Christmas for FSU were killing us up the middle yet Richt kept running at them. I think we were all begging for some off tackle runs especially at Burns who rushed up field every play.
And the "****" you're talking about: Do you think it's really **** to run a bubble screen? A simple rub route? Quick throws to get the ball out of Kosi's hands and neutralize the poor OL. We can acknowledge that both play calling and the execution were poor. They're not mutually exclusive.