- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 59,051
Think if we can't land a passer who's clearly better right now than Emory, we need to bring in a portal QB who's a running threat. Why I'm high on Arnold. That way in the worst case - the running threat QB doesn't show the ability to be the starter cause of his passing and Emory hasn't developed enough as a thrower to be the clear cut starter - we might be able to cobble together a productive offense with some sort of platoon.
**** we really gonna ride wit emory next year
Source?**** we really gonna ride wit emory next year![]()
No source just replying to post of not contacting mensah at allSource?
Not even two days into the portal cycle. Heck of an assumption you're making...No source just replying to post of not contacting mensah at all
That would be odd, given earlier articles referring to Mensah as the top player in the transfer portal.Rumblings on the interwebz that....checks notes...Duke is the front runner for this kid.
Is this kid playing in their bowl game?
No chance he plays in the bowl game if what @Notsince1985 said is true. Buddy is gone
**** we really gonna ride wit emory next year![]()
Arnold is my QB1 in the portal so I get it. I’m also a believer of Miller Moss if he were to come. Dude would get 3500 yards and a ton of TDs in this offense with Miamis oline. Especially if it’s a package deal with Duece Robinson and Zach Branch.
Dmoney has one post up about a QB in the portal and it's him. I don't buy for a second that Miami isn't on him in some way.
Not even two days into the portal cycle. Heck of an assumption you're making...
A) He sucksJust wanna put out there that Beck is dating one of the cavander Twins and if this backup ends up proving himself….just saying IF any of the play off teams were to lose QBs he’d be it and he’d make sense for Miami
Emory isnt close to weigman or moss…and im not all that high on those twoThe question is - if we don't get Mateer or Mensah, is it worth splurging on a QB that is marginally better than an Emory versus investing that in overhauling the defense?
I may get roasted for thinking that as we really haven't seen enough of Emory. I acknowledge that I'm probably wrong here but I'm just not convinced the Weigman, Moss, Maalik's of the world are significantly better than Emory. That's more an indictment on the overall talent pool in the QB portal as opposed to my thoughts on Emory's ceiling.