no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
Yeah...a team that lost 4 games doesn't NEED as many good players as they can get, at whatever position.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
Yeah. Your argument is much better. Let's go with that. Fournette and Cook are identical situations to Powell, who was a local kid committed to us for almost a year and whom committed elsewhere, by his own word, because we told him not to enroll. Great comparison. Good job, good effort.
Are you f'ing people serious? The kid was committed for months and set to enroll early. He should be on campus by now. Amazing the lengths some of you will go to rationalize this crap.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
Yeah...a team that lost 4 games doesn't NEED as many good players as they can get, at whatever position.
Excellent point, who cares about numbers....let's take everyone.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
Yeah. Your argument is much better. Let's go with that. Fournette and Cook are identical situations to Powell, who was a local kid committed to us for almost a year and whom committed elsewhere, by his own word, because we told him not to enroll. Great comparison. Good job, good effort.
Are you f'ing people serious? The kid was committed for months and set to enroll early. He should be on campus by now. Amazing the lengths some of you will go to rationalize this crap.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
you got me. lol. i was just trying to be positive.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
Great argument...let's play that game. Hey, if we get Fournette does that make up for Powell, no because we could have had both. Hey, if we get Cook does that make up for Powell, nope...coulda had both.
Maybe we don't NEED both, I mean that's always possible.
Yeah. Your argument is much better. Let's go with that. Fournette and Cook are identical situations to Powell, who was a local kid committed to us for almost a year and whom committed elsewhere, by his own word, because we told him not to enroll. Great comparison. Good job, good effort.
Are you f'ing people serious? The kid was committed for months and set to enroll early. He should be on campus by now. Amazing the lengths some of you will go to rationalize this crap.
Or what? What's your alternative...your intimating the staff dropped the ball here or got out recruited. They didn't want the kid. Do I agree, no....but that's the reality. I think Golden's been ******* it up lately, but the staff didn't get out recruited, they told the kid not to come.
no. because that would mean we could have had them both. Thanks for playing though.
you got me. lol. i was just trying to be positive.
all good bro, I get the desire to be positive. Frankly, I think there's enough positivity surrounding the qualification of Gray. We don't need to try to use that to spin that re: the powell situation.
Does a kid already committed to us getting into school make up for us losing a 4-star playmaker to a rival the day he was set to enroll?
No.