Transfer Portal Exemptions

[Jaxson Villain]

We can only get a REPLACEMENT IC (up to 7 max) for every kid who enters the portal AFTER DECEMBER 15TH.

So, as of the current moment, we have ONE replacement IC (Nesta Silvera).

EDIT: SORRY FOR BEING LATE TO THE PARTY.

So let’s say hypothetically we sign 15 highschool kids and we use our full 7 alotted transfer replacements, does that mean we signed 15 kids towards the 25 IC? If so, does that mean we get +10 IC for next year?

 

[TheOriginalCane]

So let’s say hypothetically we sign 15 highschool kids and we use our full 7 alotted transfer replacements, does that mean we signed 15 kids towards the 25 IC? If so, does that mean we get +10 IC for next year?

Not sure yet. In all honesty, I believe the 7 extra will be for this year only UNLESS AND UNTIL the NCAA makes a new rule. Therefore, if you have 25 (and I believe we already used 3 under Manny, leaving us at 22), I think you would only get rollover on the number under 22, not the number under 29. The reason I believe this is that the rule for replacement ICs is CURRENTLY a one-year-only rule. If it gets revised to become semi-permanent, I could see carryovers happening.

 

[Jaxson Villain]

Not sure yet. In all honesty, I believe the 7 extra will be for this year only UNLESS AND UNTIL the NCAA makes a new rule. Therefore, if you have 25 (and I believe we already used 3 under Manny, leaving us at 22), I think you would only get rollover on the number under 22, not the number under 29. The reason I believe this is that the rule for replacement ICs is CURRENTLY a one-year-only rule. If it gets revised to become semi-permanent, I could see carryovers happening.

Got it, thanks.

 

[grover]

Not to split hairs, but I thought only 2 of last year's portal kids were blue shirted and counted against the 2022 class -- i.e., I thought we had 23 to hit the class cap. That would mean 23 + 7 = 30, not 22 + 7 = 30.

Either way, I highly doubt we'll use all these counters. Lots of room. Just find the right guys and no more obvious JAGs.

 

[Da Jumbo Mutombo]

@TheOriginalCane

Your job here answering all these questions would be so much easier if we were Bama, UGa, or A&M.

Same answer would always apply: Who gives a fck what the rule says, we do what we want.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

@TheOriginalCane

Your job here answering all these questions would be so much easier if we were Bama, UGa, or A&M.

Same answer would always apply: Who gives a fck what the rule says, we do what we want.

Truth.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

Not to split hairs, but I thought only 2 of last year's portal kids were blue shirted and counted against the 2022 class -- i.e., I thought we had 23 to hit the class cap. That would mean 23 + 7 = 30, not 22 + 7 = 30.

Either way, I highly doubt we'll use all these counters. Lots of room. Just find the right guys and no more obvious JAGs.

Late RB, Late OL, Late Punter.

 

[90scane]

Actually, the most interesting question would be rollovers.

For instance, we have 22 regular and 7 replacement ICs...let's say we sign 22 guys...how do you treat the 7 replacement ICs? Do you use those "first", and then carry over the extra 7 "regular"? Because I never heard that the Replacement ICs could be carried forward.

Just spitballing until I can read the rules more closely.

I'd assume the NCAA will require documentation showing the IC replacement. Thus, if Miami documents 7 departures with 7 replacements the old IC rule of rolling forward would work for Jan '23 enrollees.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

I'd assume the NCAA will require documentation showing the IC replacement. Thus, if Miami documents 7 departures with 7 replacements the old IC rule of rolling forward would work for Jan '23 enrollees.

Again, that is a possibility. Just not so sure yet.

Would love to see Mario take 29 (assuming 6 more post-12/15 portal departures), even if some of the Portal kids are JAGs.

A 1-year rental JAG doesn't hurt us as much as a 5-year HS JAG does. We need depth.