Too Richt Searel Leaves Streaky Lines

Moro

Thunderdome
Joined
Mar 6, 2016
Messages
709
This doesn't always come up and is often overlooked, but one of the most interesting games within the game of football is the splits between the offensive linemen. If you don’t get this right before the snap your offense will fail long term. The result will be every spectator screaming for the OC’s head, “bad offense” or “bad play calling”. So the initial knee-jerk reaction is partly based on emotions the other part is knowledge. We’ll let them do a self-check on emotions. The rest of U will get a better understanding of why an otherwise successful play failed.

I know some people have a better understanding of protection schemes but if you don’t understand splits nothing offensively will work consistently. You can put your mom at LT if she’s lined up properly she’ll at least know which defender she needs to block. It starts first with football IQ. This is key; everything starts upfront!

To understand why splits matter, you need to understand how defensive fronts align.

Defensive Fronts:

Typically, most defenses are taught to align on the basis of where the offensive guys align, which makes sense because those defenders are trying to get through or around the blockers to get to the running back or quarterback. So defensive linemen and linebackers were told from the earliest days of football to align "on the inside eye of the guard," "heads up the center," or "on the outside eye of the tackle."

The linebackers had similar instructions, though they aligned behind the defensive line. Over time, defenses got better at mixing up these alignments, even before the snap. We've all seen linemen shift from the outside eye of the guard to the gap between the guard and center, or simply align late. All this is designed to confuse blocking schemes.

Defensive Line Numbering System (Techniques):

So as offenses became more complex, it became necessary to give linemen rules that would allow the run play to be blocked no matter what games the defense played, and to do that you needed a nomenclature that could be communicated via playbook as well as on the sideline (or at the line) in the heat of a game. This system became known as the assignment of defensive "techniques" to each defensive player. Credit to Oail Andrew "Bum" Phillips in 1958. Below is an example of the numbering system.

technique.jpg

Note that this is not the same as "hole numbering," because it is about where the defender aligns not where the run is designed to go. Although it looks a bit confusing, this system is used at literally every level of football, from pee wee football to the NFL. Below is another diagram with slightly different nomenclature, though it also specifies the "gaps."

GapsandTechniquesDiagram.jpg

So now that we know that defenses align based on where the offense aligns, and we know that offenses identify defenses based on the alignment, we can discuss splits. It's a bit of an over simplification, but the choice is basically between tight or wide splits. So let's go!

Wide Splits:

Some teams use a lot of wide splits, with as much as three to even six feet between linemen, while others keep it closer to roughly a foot, or even toe-to-toe.

Traditionally, the teams with the widest splits were option running teams. The reason is that they used a lot of man blocking rules (i.e. block your man, rather than zone an area). More importantly though, by splitting out, because the defense aligned on the basis of where the offensive linemen were, the guy the QB was reading was split out.

Tight Splits:

Tight splits are the most common. In fact, most people probably don't think of them as tight, but merely notice when they see "wide splits."

The advantage of tight splits are easy to see: Linemen are close to each other so you can get good teamwork between them; there are few or at least narrow gaps between them; and the line is constricted to keep defenders away from outside runs and quick outside throws.

The New Wide Splits Trend:

Traditionally passing teams took very narrow splits to stop inside penetration; Texas Tech used exceptionally large splits. Their rationale was a few-fold: (a) make the pass rushers come from farther away and enlarge the pocket, (b) open up throwing lanes for the quarterback, and (c) because they throw so much, all they need is a block or two to have an effective draw play -- the defensive ends aren't even really a factor. They could do this because they were almost exclusively a "man" pass protection team.

The obvious concerns are that if one guy gets beat in pass protection then there is no help, and also that there are wide gaps for linebackers to shoot through. For the latter, Tech felt like they could hurt that in other ways, through quick passes, screens, outside run plays, and traps. And they also felt that they could simply teach their linemen to be smart and reactive, and still stop that kind of penetration.

For the former problem though, the answer is simply that they have to have good blockers. They freely admitted that they put their linemen one on one a great deal of the time, but their philosophy was that if someone gets to the quarterback, everyone knows who got beat. More and more teams have been adopting this strategy.

Leach went to this trend after he got away from having a two-back formation as his primary one for passing downs. With a two-back offense you can stop a lot of overload passing threats to either side, but with a one-back formation -- as the primary version -- the wide splits were necessary to take those extra rushers out of the play.

So Which Split To Use In Your Scheme?

The choice of what splits a team uses will vary by play. Some will rely on teamwork and overwhelming force to overpower the defense, others will play games daring them to stop the play they have called, and others, like Texas Tech, build it into their philosophy.

The Challenge For Fans, Richt And Searels:

• Find out what is tipping off defenders to the play you’ve called.
> If you have built a tendency (like running inside whenever you go wide or tight splits), you simply self-scout, figure that out, and then confuse the defense by breaking your own tendency. Some of your biggest plays will come when you break your own tendencies.

• Scrapping the offense, playbook, QB, OL and OC is not “THE” answer when troubleshooting the offense. The same results will happen again if you ignore these little details that get overlooked.
> Every blocker must know how to line up; why they are there; who should be blocked if this or that happens.

The Keys To This Discussion:

• Understand why splits are keys to every plays chance of success or failure.
• Understand why the OL, TE, or FB needs to study opponents defensive fronts each week.
• Understand why it was said that football is hard.

Miami vs UNC Game Analysis:

Play call success rate was compromised before the snap.

Notice the splits on the first two series of the start of the game. We were in tight splits every time we ran the ball even when we passed you could assume the pass was either a pass to the RB or short pass to the flats. This sets the tone on what to key on the rest of the game.

First Half:

Keys: U didn't really have to pay attention to the formation to know what was coming. Splits gave it away in the first two series.
Pass: Tight splits pass to RB or short pass out to flats. Run: Tight splits
Result: U go 1 for 4 on possessions at the end of first half.
Points: 3

Second Half:

Adjustment: U adjusted now you run both Wide and Tight splits.

Keys: When you go long you have wide splits target WR and TE. Run: When U in tight splits still run but mix short passes a little more to WR and TE.
Result: U go 2 for 5 on possessions at the end of second half.
Points: 14

Here Is Why Splits Matter With Darling (OL):

Last series 4th qtr winning or tying drive:

Keys: DC picks up on what U are doing on the line. Some of this he saves when he needs a play, short yards, red zone, momentum change, etc..

First and Ten: 1:45 ball on Ur 20 yard line

U go wide splits between the G and T to protect against the rush from the outside when you want to throw long. However, you're still split tight inside with G and C to protect the rush up the middle.

Result: Darling struggles a little with the rush but holds up against the DE long enough for the play to have success.

First and Ten: 1:39 ball on Ur 31 yard line

U go tight splits outside and wide splits inside with C and G to allow the RB to run through the line more freely in his route across the middle against the MLB.

This is an obvious passing situation because you are working against the clock and you need 7 points to win or 3 to tie. So the DE improves his "angle" by stepping outside just a little more this time for the speed rush against the LT. Darling gets exploited because he has to reach on his second kick step because the pocket is too constricted in this situation and therefore leaves him working at a disadvantage against the DE. And doesn't allow him to put his hands on the DE to ride him around the QB.

Result: Kayaa getting tomahawked from the backside. Darling, Kayaa, OL and OC all look bad because the splits took the LT out of position to be successful. So the LT's talent is nullified by "techniques".

KABOOM!!! Expression @.012 Uh, Does Splits Matter? Don't Ever Let Anyone Tell U They Don't Because U Just Witnessed It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SR4QKqanys

Oh, **** Yeah; Splits Matter!!! SMDH; That **** Moro Figured This Ish Out! I Don't Like'em But.... The Evidence Says It's So. Fug!!!
Blacksburg Becomes Sacksburg: Virginia Tech 8 Sacks vs Miami:
[video=youtube;HbnBUXfQSZ0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbnBUXfQSZ0[/video]
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Moro, thanks for the post.

Would be helpful if you include some All-22s or screenshots from our OL. What do you see from our splits? What do you see as issues or areas for improvement?
 
I don't even know what he said, but whatever it was, it seems like a lot of well-intentioned effort so I up voted it. Thanks OP.
 
Advertisement
Didn't read.




We use standard sized splits because of the offense we run, whereas Oregon and some of these other spread schools have massively wide splits which is partly to open natural running lanes and spread out the defense for individual matchups basically, plus it helps with pass rush.


So right now you're thinking, "well our OL sucks, why arent we doing this?" We can't do this due to the style of offense we play. These tend to be more zone blocking schemes where the RB can hit and go, not gonna work well with a FB and our hat on a hat blocking scheme were running now with Searels.
 
Last edited:
The key is being innovative thinking outside the box. You can do almost anything as long as you understand the principles and concepts of what you're doing and what you want to incorporate into your version of attack. The TE/FB can be masked through motion, or set to function as a blocker\receiver. The pro set and its extensions incorporates the use of spread offensive principles and concepts. No matter what style of offense you run your OL, TE or FB should understand techniques.
 
Last edited:
I just watched Brady (Statues) QB throw for almost 1,000 yards in the past two games after his return. Has anyone noticed the splits New England is using in their modified version of the New England extension to the pro set?

Belichik is "killing it" with the little details!!!
 
Last edited:
Moro, thanks for the post.

Would be helpful if you include some All-22s or screenshots from our OL. What do you see from our splits? What do you see as issues or areas for improvement?

Agree. I think this is a nice write-up, but it needs application to our situation.
 
Advertisement
This doesn't always come up and is often overlooked, but one of the most interesting games within the game of football is the splits between the offensive linemen. If you don’t get this right before the snap your offense will fail long term. The result will be every spectator screaming for the OC’s head, “bad offense” or “bad play calling”. So the initial knee-jerk reaction is partly based on emotions the other part is knowledge. We’ll let them do a self-check on emotions. The rest of U will get a better understanding of why an otherwise successful play failed.

I know some people have a better understanding of protection schemes but if you don’t understand splits nothing offensively will work consistently. You can put your mom at LT if she’s lined up properly she’ll at least know which defender she needs to block. It starts first with football IQ. This is key; everything starts upfront!

To understand why splits matter, you need to understand how defensive fronts align.

Defensive Fronts:

Typically, most defenses are taught to align on the basis of where the offensive guys align, which makes sense because those defenders are trying to get through or around the blockers to get to the running back or quarterback. So defensive linemen and linebackers were told from the earliest days of football to align "on the inside eye of the guard," "heads up the center," or "on the outside eye of the tackle."

The linebackers had similar instructions, though they aligned behind the defensive line. Over time, defenses got better at mixing up these alignments, even before the snap. We've all seen linemen shift from the outside eye of the guard to the gap between the guard and center, or simply align late. All this is designed to confuse blocking schemes.

Defensive Line Numbering System (Techniques):

So as offenses became more complex, it became necessary to give linemen rules that would allow the run play to be blocked no matter what games the defense played, and to do that you needed a nomenclature that could be communicated via playbook as well as on the sideline (or at the line) in the heat of a game. This system became known as the assignment of defensive "techniques" to each defensive player. Credit to Oail Andrew "Bum" Phillips in 1958. Below is an example of the numbering system.

View attachment 39625

Note that this is not the same as "hole numbering," because it is about where the defender aligns not where the run is designed to go. Although it looks a bit confusing, this system is used at literally every level of football, from pee wee football to the NFL. Below is another diagram with slightly different nomenclature, though it also specifies the "gaps."

View attachment 39626

So now that we know that defenses align based on where the offense aligns, and we know that offenses identify defenses based on the alignment, we can discuss splits. It's a bit of an over simplification, but the choice is basically between tight or wide splits. So let's go!

Wide Splits:

Some teams use a lot of wide splits, with as much as three to even six feet between linemen, while others keep it closer to roughly a foot, or even toe-to-toe.

Traditionally, the teams with the widest splits were option running teams. The reason is that they used a lot of man blocking rules (i.e. block your man, rather than zone an area). More importantly though, by splitting out, because the defense aligned on the basis of where the offensive linemen were, the guy the QB was reading was split out.

Tight Splits:

Tight splits are the most common. In fact, most people probably don't think of them as tight, but merely notice when they see "wide splits."

The advantage of tight splits are easy to see: Linemen are close to each other so you can get good teamwork between them; there are few or at least narrow gaps between them; and the line is constricted to keep defenders away from outside runs and quick outside throws.

The New Wide Splits Trend:

Traditionally passing teams took very narrow splits to stop inside penetration; Texas Tech took exceptionally large splits. Their rationale was a few-fold: (a) make the pass rushers come from farther away and enlarge the pocket, (b) open up throwing lanes for the quarterback, and (c) because they throw so much, all they need is a block or two to have an effective draw play -- the defensive ends aren't even really a factor. They could do this because they were almost exclusively a "man" pass protection team.

The obvious concerns are that if one guy gets beat in pass protection then there is no help, and also that there are wide gaps for linebackers to shoot through. For the latter, Tech felt like they could hurt that in other ways, through quick passes, screens, outside run plays, and traps. And they also felt that they could simply teach their linemen to be smart and reactive, and still stop that kind of penetration.

For the former problem though, the answer is simply that they have to have good blockers. They freely admitted that they put their linemen one on one a great deal of the time, but their philosophy was that if someone gets to the quarterback, everyone knows who got beat. More and more teams have been adopting this strategy.

Leach went to this trend after he got away from having a two-back formation as his primary one for passing downs. With a two-back offense you can stop a lot of overload passing threats to either side, but with a one-back formation -- as the primary version -- the wide splits were necessary to take those extra rushers out of the play.

So Which Split To Use In Your Scheme?

The choice of what splits a team uses will vary by play. Some will rely on teamwork and overwhelming force to overpower the defense, others will play games daring them to stop the play they have called, and others, like Texas Tech, build it into their philosophy.

The Challenge For Fans, Richt And Searels:

• Find out what is tipping off defenders to the play you’ve called.
> If you have built a tendency (like running inside whenever you go wide or tight splits), you simply self-scout, figure that out, and then confuse the defense by breaking your own tendency. Some of your biggest plays will come when you break your own tendencies.

• Scrapping the offense, playbook, QB, OL and OC is not “THE” answer when troubleshooting the offense. The same results will happen again if you ignore these little details that get overlooked.
> Every blocker must know how to line up; why they are there; who should be blocked if this or that happens.

The Keys To This Discussion:

• Understand why splits are keys to every plays chance of success or failure.
• Understand why the OL, TE, or FB needs to study opponents defensive fronts each week.
• Understand why it was said that football is hard.

So you have a log in to USA Football... I think we just found our New OC.
 
Good stuff OP. I am not well versed in the details, but as an old Fins' fan and west end zone type, I remember the Zonk days verses the Dan days and a big difference in oline splits. We didn't pass protect very well in Shula's early years unless it was play action and could run block worth a crap in pass happy Danny days. I always thought the splits had a lot to do with that.
 
Obviously it's not this simple, but can't a DL just line up in that big gap the OL leaves when they line up wide? Why follow the OL as opposed to run right through that big *** hole they've left you?
 
You can use your TE\FB to motion to the threat or the QB can check to a play to counter whatever the defense does. The TE\FB can help your T\G with difficult angles by chipping the defender in whatever counter is to the threat. It comes down to how you want to use your 6th or 7th man in your protection scheme.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Obviously it's not this simple, but can't a DL just line up in that big gap the OL leaves when they line up wide? Why follow the OL as opposed to run right through that big *** hole they've left you?
Doesnt work that way.



Say a DL lines up in that in between 2 OL in the wide gap, well then it makes it very easy to basically just block down that defender then **** have no leverage to the outside. Sure it makes it easier for the DL to just slant into the gap or whatever but hes essentially just gonna block himself out of the play every snap
 
Arguably two of the best QB's in the league in 2015 were statues and one of them retired this year. One of the best minds in football isn't following the trend to mobile QB's like almost every other team has. He's stockpiling them and showing everyone how to use a statues QB. The U's roots are rooted in stockpiling these types of QB's and we need to get back to innovating ways to use them.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Arguably two of the best QB's in the league in 2015 were statues and one of them retired this year. One of the best minds in football isn't following the trend to mobile QB's like almost every other team has. He's stockpiling them and showing everyone how to use a statues QB. The U's roots are rooted in stockpiling these types of QB's and we need to get back to innovating ways to use them.

Brady and Manning are legendary in there pocket presence and feeling the rush and moving around just enough to buy time, gigantic leap from Kaayak
 
GhostoVince wrote, "Brady and Manning are legendary in there pocket presence and feeling the rush and moving around just enough to buy time, gigantic leap from Kaayak."

Get a football and walk into your hallway closet. Try a drop back pass, a hand-off or play-action pass. Now take that football and walk outside into your yard and repeat the same plays. After you’re done with each play ask yourself do you notice a difference in your awareness and mobility running those plays. In which area did you seem to appear more aware and fleet of foot? Ask yourself did your awareness and mobility get any better when you were confined to a closet versus your yard?

That is just an example of how splits can affect the play and the QB in the pocket. Now view a game and look at how the splits were used to help Brady and Manning in their careers. Kayaa maybe a legendary QB one day, we don’t know that yet because he never ran Richt's pro-style offense. We do know what he can do in other systems. We also know that this new system takes time to learn but there are other components that make it all work consistently.
 
Last edited:
Here is what fans were saying about Brady during his struggles. Virtually every comment you hear today about Kayaa and Richt they said about Brady and Belichik. Belichik went into the lab examined each detail of his offense now everyone can't figure out what changes he made. Are U ready for the journey?

Here is what the journey to success looks like with a statues QB:

[video=youtube;PSIxAXoj_fk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSIxAXoj_fk&spfreload=1[/video]
 
Moro - so you're saying regardless of which splits we're using - each with its advantages and disadvantages - that by altering our splits - we're giving advance signals as to our play call?

Like a "tell" in playing poker?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top