RedPill Stepdad
graduated from hungry, and made it to greedy.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 5,856
The "multiple" or "pro spread" offense we run now may benefit in recruiting by helping players be better prepared for pro schemes, but I have a hard time believing it's the best system in college football. Out of the top 12 offenses last year 10 of them ran a true spread or air raid. The 2 that ran the system we run now are Alabama and maybe Clemson. Two teams that have so much talent, they could run the wishbone and be successful. Spread is what works in college football, period. Teams with mid level talent like UCF and Houston are putting up 40+points a game, man. That's why I was so ****ed that politics came into play getting a top OC in Briles. Instead we let him walk to a team we play every year. Oh, and that team just so happens to be our biggest rival too.
It is mind blowing that in a recruiting area like Miami, an area that produces athletes that are spread ready, we have yet to run a true spread offense. If Dan Enos is as good of an OC as everyone thinks, he will implement more true spread concepts to maximize potential.
(I doubt we see calling plays from a huddle 10-15 years from now in the NFL. Just saying.)
EDIT: Just did some more research and it's really like 80% or more of the top 25 offenses in college football run the spread. That's very telling.
It is mind blowing that in a recruiting area like Miami, an area that produces athletes that are spread ready, we have yet to run a true spread offense. If Dan Enos is as good of an OC as everyone thinks, he will implement more true spread concepts to maximize potential.
(I doubt we see calling plays from a huddle 10-15 years from now in the NFL. Just saying.)
EDIT: Just did some more research and it's really like 80% or more of the top 25 offenses in college football run the spread. That's very telling.
Last edited: