Regardless of everyone's view on Reynolds and/or DBC, this is emblematic of a greater issue.
We have a class of reporters who do good work. Reynolds and Barry Jackson are my favorites because they are indeed well-sourced and Reynolds especially can be funny on Twitter. Other beat writers fill a role that's been around in the sports industry for a long time, and these writers are very protective of their roles -- especially in a media landscape in flux. I don't need to name names or outlets.
On the flip side, there is a whole new subset of media (online, digital, blog, podcast, non-newspaper, etc.), and beyond that, independent fan personalities who cover the team as a hobby. While these people don't cover the program from a traditional means, they're often just as well-sourced than the legacy writers, perhaps even more so. Again, I won't name names.
This scares the traditional reporters because if other people have better scoops, then why would anyone read their writing? Reynolds and Barry do have some good sources in the program and on the BOT. But some of the non-traditional media types have good relationships with players and recruiting sources and in turn, real information competing the with more mainstream reporting. And as a result, some of the media members do look down on other credentialed media, quasi-media or even rank and file fans who may or may not have information.