Tim Reynolds loves canesinsight

I'm glad Reynolds finally outed himself as the childish btich that he is.

Many people thought it before. Now they know.
 
Advertisement
Reynolds looks petty, but posting Golden's address is straight-up pathetic.

Obviously, this site doesn't "permit" that and it was taken down as soon as it was seen by a Moderator. Reynolds' message is simply inaccurate and curiously inflammatory. It's expressly against the rules of the forum to post personal information.

Since Mr. Reynolds or whomever relayed him this info obviously visit the forum, he'd know that this is fast-paced and it's not practical to have every message approved before it's posted. That's not how message boards work.

Mr. Reynolds is welcome on here to discuss anything he'd like to address. We're not very hard to find. It's a free website. As for his tweets, I encourage him, as a self-proclaimed "real" journalist, to offer the entire story (meaning immediate actions taken) with the same tone and ferocity he offered the inflammatory portion.

Lu, that was public records and Al is a public person. I would post his address but it is not confidential information. Fine to take it off but Tim should have to tell us who told him to attack the site.
 
B372-dmIQAE5_F4.jpg

sheesh, what a mess. Don't even know where to start. A tucked in white undershirt and a black belt? Bad look, Tim.
 
Reynolds looks petty, but posting Golden's address is straight-up pathetic.

Obviously, this site doesn't "permit" that and it was taken down as soon as it was seen by a Moderator. Reynolds' message is simply inaccurate and curiously inflammatory. It's expressly against the rules of the forum to post personal information.

Since Mr. Reynolds or whomever relayed him this info obviously visit the forum, he'd know that this is fast-paced and it's not practical to have every message approved before it's posted. That's not how message boards work.

Mr. Reynolds is welcome on here to discuss anything he'd like to address. We're not very hard to find. It's a free website. As for his tweets, I encourage him, as a self-proclaimed "real" journalist, to offer the entire story (meaning immediate actions taken) with the same tone and ferocity he offered the inflammatory portion.

And this is one of the reasons Congress made it clear that websites, such as this one, are not liable for the content porsted (i.e., published) by third parties (with limited exceptions not even remotely applicable here). The overreaction here is laughable. From one of the seminal CDA cases:

"It would be impossible for service providers to screen each of their millions of postings for possible problems. Faced with potential liability for each message republished by their services, interactive computer service providers might choose to severely restrict the number and type of messages posted. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect."
 
Fly banners... Don't renew your tix... Boo as loud as you want.. Don't buy another piece of merchandise... Email your displeasure or post it on here or anywhere all you want... But threatening a mans home & family is really pathetic & nothing to even joke about... Grow up guys
 
Reynolds looks petty, but posting Golden's address is straight-up pathetic.

Obviously, this site doesn't "permit" that and it was taken down as soon as it was seen by a Moderator. Reynolds' message is simply inaccurate and curiously inflammatory. It's expressly against the rules of the forum to post personal information.

Since Mr. Reynolds or whomever relayed him this info obviously visit the forum, he'd know that this is fast-paced and it's not practical to have every message approved before it's posted. That's not how message boards work.

Mr. Reynolds is welcome on here to discuss anything he'd like to address. We're not very hard to find. It's a free website. As for his tweets, I encourage him, as a self-proclaimed "real" journalist, to offer the entire story (meaning immediate actions taken) with the same tone and ferocity he offered the inflammatory portion.

In addition to this, if Canesport or InsidetheU had the same post up for whatever amount of time Reynolds would not have tweeted anything.

Well, that is not really the same. Nobody goes to them so the information is not actually "disclosed" it is hidden in a secret place.
 
he's a hack for blake and golden. who do they always go to for protection? he is attacking this site because the movement is gaining traction.
 
Advertisement
Anyone who is remotely familiar with real journalism knows that this guy isnt a journalist. He's a glorified blogger whose so-called best work is comprised of 140 characters on a social media platform. This guy dreams of being a journalist, onlny to wake up and stare in the mirror, quickly realizing that it's time for a snack.
 
Reynolds looks petty, but posting Golden's address is straight-up pathetic.

Obviously, this site doesn't "permit" that and it was taken down as soon as it was seen by a Moderator. Reynolds' message is simply inaccurate and curiously inflammatory. It's expressly against the rules of the forum to post personal information.

Since Mr. Reynolds or whomever relayed him this info obviously visit the forum, he'd know that this is fast-paced and it's not practical to have every message approved before it's posted. That's not how message boards work.

Mr. Reynolds is welcome on here to discuss anything he'd like to address. We're not very hard to find. It's a free website. As for his tweets, I encourage him, as a self-proclaimed "real" journalist, to offer the entire story (meaning immediate actions taken) with the same tone and ferocity he offered the inflammatory portion.

And this is one of the reasons Congress made it clear that websites, such as this one, are not liable for the content porsted (i.e., published) by third parties (with limited exceptions not even remotely applicable here). The overreaction here is laughable. From one of the seminal CDA cases:

"It would be impossible for service providers to screen each of their millions of postings for possible problems. Faced with potential liability for each message republished by their services, interactive computer service providers might choose to severely restrict the number and type of messages posted. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect."

It's fine. Thank you. We know the law and we know we acted accordingly. We took it down immediately.

My mistake, however, was not providing proper reference for a portion of my remarks (bolded and enlarged):

Tom,_Michael,_Senate.webp
 
The best part is that he is giving this site free advertisement. Doing himself no favors bc he obviously hates Pete and Tito bc they own him on Miami Sports.
 
Guess he cant take a joke
I want golden gone but that's not funny . You act like there arent crazy people in the world where rec league referees have been killed for a bad call.
His kids live there, grow the **** up.
 
Advertisement
Reynolds looks petty, but posting Golden's address is straight-up pathetic.

Obviously, this site doesn't "permit" that and it was taken down as soon as it was seen by a Moderator. Reynolds' message is simply inaccurate and curiously inflammatory. It's expressly against the rules of the forum to post personal information.

Since Mr. Reynolds or whomever relayed him this info obviously visit the forum, he'd know that this is fast-paced and it's not practical to have every message approved before it's posted. That's not how message boards work.

Mr. Reynolds is welcome on here to discuss anything he'd like to address. We're not very hard to find. It's a free website. As for his tweets, I encourage him, as a self-proclaimed "real" journalist, to offer the entire story (meaning immediate actions taken) with the same tone and ferocity he offered the inflammatory portion.

In addition to this, if Canesport or InsidetheU had the same post up for whatever amount of time Reynolds would not have tweeted anything.

He is butt hurt over the fake tweet that rustled up his contact in admin, and felt he needed to defend it thinking it came from here. It didn't come from this website, it was another website that many of us know well. Either way, we don't need to give anyone or anything a way to attack this place. This place has a good rep and the traffic proves it out. We don't need to ***** it up. It's why I take and took such a strong stance on it to defend it.
 
Fly banners... Don't renew your tix... Boo as loud as you want.. Don't buy another piece of merchandise... Email your displeasure or post it on here or anywhere all you want... But threatening a mans home & family is really pathetic & nothing to even joke about... Grow up guys

Who threatned his home or family?

I read the original thread and there wasn't a threat in it. Except for the one about fex ex and dog ****. Other than that STFU about schit that you obviously don't know anything about. Dumb fvckers like you are why stupid fvcks like Slim Reynolds can still hold a job.
 

He wanted to be a luger but doesn't fit down the track. I wish they sent his gingerness back to candyland.
 
Back
Top