I'm not even mad about UVA, they went 7-1 in conference, they EARNED their way in. Once the conference expanded, it became about luck of the draw in regards to who you played in conference, especially once divisions were eliminated. No one could actually predict year to year who is good and who isn't.
The issue is Duke. I'm still in disbelief that the tiebreaker procedure is this incredibly convoluted and stupid, while also avoiding the one thing that should be considered in case of a tie, where everyone didn't play each other: CFP RANKINGS. The WHOLE POINT of the conference championship game is to not only crown a champion, but provide a stage to showcase the conference. You want your BEST TEAMS in that game. In case of a tie, the CFP rankings should be used, because it ensures that stupid crap like this never happens. You have five teams tied at 6-2, and the WORST team, who didn't beat any of the teams they are tied with gets in because terrible Syracuse decided to mail it in against a terrible BC team.