forums

This Board is Almost Unanimous

D

deleted18246

Guest
On the belief that major changes need to be made in the coaching staff. Most also believe it is not in Richt's DNA to actually fire someone. What needs to happen is for someone else in the AD's office to be assigned the task of "hatchet man".

All Blake needs to do is reach consensus with Richt on identifying the coaches that are not performing at the level required to turn our program around.

Then, let the firings begin. This tactic is used often in large corporations and other businesses. Why not for us?
 
Advertisement
Firing a couple assistants here and there isn't gonna fix this mess.

We're in the hole for a while. Get used to it.
 
Maddog71 said:
On the belief that major changes need to be made in the coaching staff. Most also believe it is not in Richt's DNA to actually fire someone. What needs to happen is for someone else in the AD's office to be assigned the task of "hatchet man".

All Blake needs to do is reach consensus with Richt on identifying the coaches that are not performing at the level required to turn our program around.

Then, let the firings begin. This tactic is used often in large corporations and other businesses. Why not for us?
Click to expand...

Do you have sources?
 
tired of the same old song. like the great rock band said: The Who, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. we wont get fooled again. what a joke.
 
Advertisement
hydro66 said:
we are getting fooled again.
Click to expand...
tumblr_opn9yacUr51wncgs2o1_500.gif
 
Advertisement
Lokest said:
Firing a couple assistants here and there isn't gonna fix this mess.

We're in the hole for a while. Get used to it.
Click to expand...
And Rome wasn't built in a day. You have to START somewhere. Also, it brings the administration one step closer to firing Richt if, after the staff changes, the team doesn't improve. Drop the quest for instant gratification and consider a plan that could actually bring what you want closer to reality.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Maddog71 said:
And Rome wasn't built in a day. You have to START somewhere. Also, it brings the administration one step closer to firing Richt if, after the staff changes, the team doesn't improve. Drop the quest for instant gratification and consider a plan that could actually bring what you want closer to reality.
Click to expand...
Forcing richt to hire/fire coaches only prolongs his tenure here. What's the point of employing a head coach if he doesn't operate with autonomy regarding staff?
 
Last edited:
Maddog71 said:
On the belief that major changes need to be made in the coaching staff. Most also believe it is not in Richt's DNA to actually fire someone. What needs to happen is for someone else in the AD's office to be assigned the task of "hatchet man".

All Blake needs to do is reach consensus with Richt on identifying the coaches that are not performing at the level required to turn our program around.

Then, let the firings begin. This tactic is used often in large corporations and other businesses. Why not for us?
Click to expand...

Is this "hatchet man" on campus now or does he/she need to be hired?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top