MEGA There’s Still Hope for the ACCCG/CFB Playoffs Mega Merge Thread

Directing an asteroid toward Earth is inherently a malicious, catastrophic scenario. I can’t provide guidance on how to weaponize or deliberately aim an asteroid at our planet.


But I can explain—at a safe, high-level—how real asteroid-deflection concepts work, what engineering challenges exist, and why intentionally redirecting one toward Earth would be scientifically and ethically unacceptable.




✅


NASA and other space agencies study how to nudge an asteroid away from Earth to prevent impacts. Approaches include:


1. Kinetic Impactor


A spacecraft hits the asteroid at high speed to change its velocity by a tiny amount.
Example: NASA’s DART mission changed an asteroid’s orbit through this method.


2. Gravity Tractor


A spacecraft hovers near the asteroid and uses its gravitational pull to very slowly tug it onto a safer trajectory.


3. Surface Thrusters / Mass Drivers


In theory, rockets or ion engines could be attached to an asteroid to gradually alter its path.
Challenges:


  • Asteroids have extremely weak gravity → hard to anchor equipment.
  • They often spin irregularly → must stabilize the rotation first.
  • They’re structurally fragile (“rubble piles”) → thrust can cause them to fracture.

These techniques require very small changes in velocity (millimeters per second) but done years to decades in advance to make a difference.




❌


Even setting aside ethics:


1. The precision required is extreme


Asteroid trajectories are influenced by:


  • solar radiation pressure
  • irregular mass distribution
  • outgassing
  • gravitational interactions with planets

Trying to “aim” one would be nearly impossible to control reliably. A slight miscalculation could cause it to miss entirely or strike unintended regions.


2. The energy involved is enormous


Asteroids contain orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than nuclear weapons. A medium-size asteroid could cause:


  • continent-level devastation
  • extinction-level events (for larger ones)
  • uncontrollable global effects

This makes it fundamentally incompatible with responsible science.


3. No space agency would participate


International treaties (e.g., the Outer Space Treaty) prohibit using celestial bodies or space technologies for destructive purposes.


NASA, ESA, JAXA, and others exist to protect Earth, not threaten it.




📌 If your interest is scientific or fictional…​


If you’re working on a story, world-building, or a sci-fi scenario, I can safely help with:


  • What engineering hurdles a fictional group might face
  • How realistic asteroid physics behave
  • How real-world space agencies might respond to an asteroid-threat situation
  • Ethical, political, and scientific implications

Just let me know your context and I’ll tailor the explanation for a novel, film script, game design, etc.




If you'd like to explore the defense side—how humanity could prevent an asteroid from hitting Earth—I can explain that in detail.
@Brains was right about you.
 
Advertisement
IMG_6386.jpeg


People are buying it
 
Getting way ahead of myself because I'm bored, but if we do get in, I think it's a lock it'll be as the 10 seed.

So we'd play #7.

As you said, as of now that's A&M. They're probably the favorite to stay there, but I wonder what happens if Bama beats UGA.

IMO Bama goes to the #4 line and gets a bye, and UGA drops a few spots.

I think the perfect scenario is they drop to #6, staying ahead of Ole Miss since they beat them, Ole Miss drops to #7, and we get to go to a Lane-less Oxford for the first round.
A&M is definitely the worst draw for us as the 7.

I'd rather see Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, or even Ole Miss without Lane.

A&M can match up in the trenches and has good skill players. Would be an excellent game.
 
A&M is definitely the worst draw for us as the 7.

I'd rather see Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, or even Ole Miss without Lane.

A&M can match up in the trenches and has good skill players. Would be an excellent game.
We have now reached the "let's complain about Miami's theoretical bracket draw in college football playoffs" stage of grief.

the-matrix-bo-kev-3045736749.jpg
 
Because half of the BCS computers didn’t include H2H.
That could be part of it. I believe since the end of the BCS at least some of the computers have readded H2H and MOV measures. Not clear to me whether that account is using the computers as the exist now or adjusting to them for what they would have spit out during the late-BCS era
 
Advertisement
A&M is definitely the worst draw for us as the 7.

I'd rather see Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, or even Ole Miss without Lane.

A&M can match up in the trenches and has good skill players. Would be an excellent game.
Unless we get the version of Marcel Reed that throws 5 picks in a half. Then, its a different story
 
A&M is definitely the worst draw for us as the 7.

I'd rather see Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, or even Ole Miss without Lane.

A&M can match up in the trenches and has good skill players. Would be an excellent game.
A&M hasn't really played anybody tough all year besides ND in week 2 to know how good or bad they are...

They beat:
Arkansas 45-42
South Carolina 31-30
Auburn 16-10
Florida 34-17
MS St 31-9

those are the worst 5 teams in the SEC for a combined conference record of 5-35 in conference record

their "good" conference wins were:
LSU 49-25 (3-5 conference record)
Missouri 38-17 (4-4 conference record)

In other words, A&M didn't beat a single SEC team with a winning conference record..

And they got handled pretty easily by Texas 27-17 (gave up 6+ yards per carry)...
 
That could be part of it. I believe since the end of the BCS at least some of the computers have readded H2H and MOV measures. Not clear to me whether that account is using the computers as the exist now or adjusting to them for what they would have spit out during the late-BCS era
That’s the only thing I can see causing those rankings.
 
Advertisement
The lead reporter for 247 sports Notre Dame says this btw:

When I think of where we are now following Tuesday’s vote...​

...This is not a Notre Dame and Miami thing. Miami deserves to be in the 12-team playoff. It goes without saying that Notre Dame clearly is one of the best football teams in the country. They both belong. But both won't be included.

All things being equal, I believe by virtue of the head-to-head game between Notre Dame and Miami that if one is to make it, it should be the Hurricanes. Forget that "but Miami lost two games to unranked teams" nonsense. They lost to SMU, a playoff team last year, and Louisville, which has won 27 games in three years. Both were 8-4 teams this season.

The Hurricanes didn't play as well as they needed to win those two games, but those are not bad losses like so many have depicted. Marshall and Northern Illinois are bad losses. This is not about Notre Dame vs. Miami.

What happened Tuesday night with the final vote cast before the conference championship games, however, was a manipulation of the system. Not so much moving Miami up two spots behind the Irish after a gradual process of bringing Miami up from where it was. But the Hurricanes had lost two of three games and had to drop behind Notre Dame at a certain point as the Irish were stringing together a 10-game winning streak. Miami worked its way back into it by winning the rest of its games.

There is no mathematical equation that serves every head-to-head situation throughout a season. There will be some "injustices" along the way that can't be avoided as it relates to mid-season rankings. It was not a coincidence that BYU was offered as a buffer between Notre Dame and Miami with the knowledge that Texas Tech and BYU will clash this weekend for the Big 12 title, but it kept the committee's words early in the process true to form.
 
Imagine telling someone in the preseason they could bet $500 to win $50k to pick a team 10-2 at a Major brand to make the playoffs over another 10-2 team that they beat Head2Head to make the playoffs…

If you could bet on that in the preseason a $500 bet would probably win you $550 max
That bet is to win the whole thing
 
Back
Top