But if Bama loses doesn’t it become a Miami vs. Bama vs. ND debate instead?He said they wanted to clarify that idle teams can move up. It wasn’t clear last year. To me it means one of two things. They are giving Bama a bit of a runway. Win, or lose close they’ll be no less than 9 imo.
BYU with one loss is ahead of us. But if they drop their game vs TT we’d move up. Then it becomes a ND vs Miami debate. Not Miami vs BYU vs ND. I’m not saying BYU should be ranked above us, but a ND vs Miami debate is drastically different than the three of us.
Well it’s all relative.But if Bama loses doesn’t it become a Miami vs. Bama vs. ND debate instead?
If Miami and ND are so comparable than why is one in front of BYU and the other behind? Seems like more of an excuse than an actual tough equation.Well it’s all relative.
Bama would have to lose convincingly. You’d be able to make a strong argument they are descending based on how they’ve performed the last four weeks.
But if Bama loses to the #2 team who they already beat close, would that warrant ND jumping them? I’d argue that’s more impressive than beating Auburn. And the chair was basically gargling Bama’s balls over that tonight.
Best case Bama wins. BYU loses. ND won’t jump OU. If they would’ve they would’ve done it by now. So OU would slot to 9 ND 10 and Miami 11. Now the argument then turns into us vs ND. As dumb as it sounds, I think BYU going 11-1 is preventing us from jumping ND.
Kinda why Texas hasn’t jumped us. Texas has better wins than us, but a far worse loss. We have a better win than BYU. But BYU didn’t lose to its inferior opponents. They only lost to the #4 team in the CFP. Right now I think what’s preventing a debate between us and ND is purely BYU. If we move to 11 I truly believe H2H will win out. But I’m a hopeless optimist.
If Bamas loses, it should become a Miami vs. Bama vs ND debate, but it won't.But if Bama loses doesn’t it become a Miami vs. Bama vs. ND debate instead?
I agree. I’m just laying out how I’m viewing this from my couch. We’ve done enough to jump every two loss team from 12-17 since the first rankings. BYU fell from 8 to 12. Still ahead of us and ND moved and stayed at 9 until tonight.If Miami and ND are so comparable than why is one in front of BYU and the other behind? Seems like more of an excuse than an actual tough equation.
All these guys care about is power and control. Part of that is having the SCORE Act pass in the House tomorrow and later in the senate. Margin is extremely tight. If one or two Florida GOP House members held out tomorrow the SEC and Big Ten would be apoplectic. There is no bigger priority for them right now.
ND lost. Quit being a sore loser. Louisville has 4 lossesDid you know that Miami was ranked ahead of Louisville when both teams were 7-2 and Louisville won head to head?
50 shades of gaslighting the past four weeks.And it's not as if the committee believes an extra loss is disqualifying. Oklahoma, Alabama, Notre Dame and Miami all have two losses and are ranked ahead of one-loss BYU (more on that in a moment), so what's the harm of moving a three-loss Texas ahead of a two-loss team that has accomplished less?
had UL finished 10-2 they would have a good argument, they didn't and unlike that dishrag you know that,Did you know that Miami was ranked ahead of Louisville when both teams were 7-2 and Louisville won head to head?
When USF was ranked 24th at 7-2 and Texas had the same record (with a UF loss, who Miami and USF beat).Did you know that Miami was ranked ahead of Louisville when both teams were 7-2 and Louisville won head to head?
Why is a bama win preferable? Not that I feel like they’ll do right by us, but a bama loss still feels like the better outcome. Especially if it’s a smashing.So we're essentially pulling for 2 things to happen that have already happened earlier this year: a Bama win over UGA (toss up), and a Texas Tech blowout of BYU (likely).
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.
No one believes (even the people backing us in the ND conversation) that a participant in the SEC title game is gonna get knocked out of the playoff. So hope Bama wins so as not to give the clowns on the committee any reason to separate us from Notre Dame in the rankingsWhy is a bama win preferable? Not that I feel like they’ll do right by us, but a bama loss still feels like the better outcome. Especially if it’s a smashing.
Why is a bama win preferable? Not that I feel like they’ll do right by us, but a bama loss still feels like the better outcome. Especially if it’s a smashing.
Bama wins guarantees they will not rank lower than 9. That means 10 MUST come down to Notre Dame, BYU, and Miami. A BYU win guarantees them the 10 seed (well technically they could go higher but thats irrelevant or us) and in the CFP which means us and Notre Dame are out. However if Bama is guaranteed a top 9 seed due to winning AND BYU loses and thus likely drops AT LEAST 1 spot, it means Notre Dame and Miami are H2H comparison for 10 and 11 seed. Are they going to keep saying H2H doesn't matter when we are Literally ranked right next to eachother AND it is for a FINAL playoff spot. Top 10 seed are the playoffs given ACC/G5 conference champs will rank lower than 10 but still get the 11&12 Seed.Why is a bama win preferable? Not that I feel like they’ll do right by us, but a bama loss still feels like the better outcome. Especially if it’s a smashing.
TTU doesn't have to blowout BYU, they just have to beat them. BYU is +390 to make the CFP on FanDuel right now. They are +400 to beat TTU. Their only chance to get in the playoff is to beat TTUSo we're essentially pulling for 2 things to happen that have already happened earlier this year: a Bama win over UGA (toss up), and a Texas Tech blowout of BYU (likely).
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.