- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 34,910
Duke has no barring on Miami making it
Exactly
Five conference champions
Seven at large
Duke has no barring on Miami making it
So about that eye test...
This is just amazing to me that we've gotten to this point in this sport.this is because it isn't going to happen. they told us last week we look good but they think ND looks better.
Jose Pate suggested Sunday night we root for Duke, putting pressure on the committee to not exclude a P4 conference.Duke has no barring on Miami making it
If Duke makes it or notJose Pate suggested Sunday night we root for Duke, putting pressure on the committee to not exclude a P4 conference.
Duke winning doesn't free up any spots. The 5 highest ranked conference champions get in. Its not 5 highest ranked conference champions in the top 25. If Duke wins and the final ranking places Duke 35th and there is another G5 school ranked 33rd, that team gets in. They rank outside of 25, they jut publish the "top" 25. There will always be 5 conference champs with auto bids in the current format. There is no chance of there not being a 5th conference champ in the "top" 25 and an extra at large bid opens up.All 3 "ranked" G5 teams now have departing coaches. Does the committee unrank JMU, UNT, and Tulane due to their departures? That frees up one spot.
Duke winning frees up another spot.
Texas Tech beating BYU again, another spot.
UGA beating Bama, another spot.
Then you have all the BS of ND vs Miami vs ....
if Duke wins and isn't ranked, and the other G5 champ wins and isn't ranked, there's a chance an extra "at large" opens up..If Duke makes it or not
It doesnt help Miami at all
It's top 5 conference champs
ok that's what I've been wondering..Duke winning doesn't free up any spots. The 5 highest ranked conference champions get in. Its not 5 highest ranked conference champions in the top 25. If Duke wins and the final ranking places Duke 35th and there is another G5 school ranked 33rd, that team gets in. They rank outside of 25, they jut publish the "top" 25. There will always be 5 conference champs with auto bids in the current format. There is no chance of there not being a 5th conference champ in the "top" 25 and an extra at large bid opens up.
The rankings go beyond 25, they just publish the TOP 25. So if the 5th conference champ is ranked 32nd, they still get in.if Duke wins and isn't ranked, and the other G5 champ wins and isn't ranked, there's a chance an extra "at large" opens up..
the criteria says "5 highest ranked conference champs"
basically, what if there are only 4 ranked conference champs?
B1G
SEC
B12
American
Its like the "others receiving votes" in the AP poll. You can rank those 26 and beyond. They just publish the top 25ok that's what I've been wondering..
does the CFP actually rank past 25? how do you know?
how do you know that?The rankings go beyond 25, they just publish the TOP 25. So if the 5th conference champ is ranked 32nd, they still get in.
how do you know that? are you just assuming? because I don't see anything that says there's a ranking beyond the top 25...Its like the "others receiving votes" in the AP poll. You can rank those 26 and beyond. They just publish the top 25
That wasn’t his point. His point was that assuming Duke wins and it’s AAC and Sun Belt taking the last two auto bids, would the committee want to completely leave out a P4 conference or just put Miami there as the final at large to not have that be the case.If Duke makes it or not
It doesnt help Miami at all
It's top 5 conference champs
That wasn’t his point. His point was that assuming Duke wins and it’s AAC and Sun Belt taking the last two auto bids, would the committee want to completely leave out a P4 conference or just put Miami there as the final at large to not have that be the case.
Whether I agree with it or not is a different discussion, but the point wasn’t that it opens up another spot, just that it may influence their decision for the final at large.
Oh, I completely agree lol. Just pointing out that he wasn’t saying it opens a spot.I listened to his show, I don't think the committee gives one smidge of one **** about leaving out the ACC entirely.
He also said he was going to address the ND-Miami argument on his show and never did.I listened to his show, I don't think the committee gives one smidge of one **** about leaving out the ACC entirely.