When it comes to Miami, I’m perpetually stage 5.
It’s a precedent the Sec has been wanting badly .sending a 3 loss team to a playoff would set a new precedence. I’m interested to see if that’s the case.
this is because it isn't going to happen. they told us last week we look good but they think ND looks better.Vegas says differently
ironically we should be ahead of all three two loss teams right now.we need a byu loss to Texas Tech and either a alabama sec title (would jump ND), or an Alabama gets beat by 3+ touchdowns to UGA
no way in **** we're taking Oklahoma or ND's spot
Miami is 7 in FPI, ahead of Georgia, A&M, Ole Miss, Oklahoma, and BYU. SMU is 24 in FPI and Louisville is 29. Virginia is 40 and Duke is 46.The subjectivity of the committee is completely biased.
The narrative of "Miami has 2 bad, unranked losses" has stuck since they first happened. But both SMU and Lou could both be ranked, if the committee wanted to. It's like a self fulfilling narrative.
They're both going to be top 30 teams by pretty much every metric but they're "unranked". If they were top 25 teams they'd be ranked.m and we'd have 2 ranked losses.
Have you seen that UGA offence? They couldn't boat race Charlotte.If Bama gets boat raced by UGA do we get in
It’s a precedent the Sec has been wanting badly .
Awkward.
If Duke wins & subsequently remains with a low ranking, could the committee take Miami as an at large bid?
(Because Duke wouldn’t be ranked high enough to get an automatic qualifier bid)
Duke has no barring on Miami making itIf Duke wins & subsequently remains with a low ranking, could the committee take Miami as an at large bid?
(Because Duke wouldn’t be ranked high enough to get an automatic qualifier bid)