Yes because they won't punish a team that is already in for losing a CCG when others behind them were home watching TVif alabama loses to georgia in sec CCG how does alabama with 3 losses get in over miami?
Yes because they won't punish a team that is already in for losing a CCG when others behind them were home watching TVif alabama loses to georgia in sec CCG how does alabama with 3 losses get in over miami?
The limit has been hurting my self expression artistic freedom.I think I got the giphy limiit fixed but continue to have performance issues with cloudflare. Server loads are fine.
Does it ***** Miami? Yes? No?if alabama loses to georgia in sec CCG how does alabama with 3 losses get in over miami?
The ACC can’t ignore its tiebreaker procedures. Guessing the aggrieved team would seek an injunction and win.Trumpycane wonders what lawsuits could come out of this or does the ACC just have the power to do this
Everyone is saying no. Something about it going to an extra group of 5. I don’t know why it wouldn’t be an option. If you already have a group of 5 slot in there then why not be able to take who you want?Could that be a scenario???
Agreed. We aren't getting into the ACCCG anyway with VTech laying in missionary willing to take whatever UVa gives them. Lets SMU get the dub and the ACCCG dub and strengthen the case to include us.Uh acc chances are cooked. Need smu to comeback and win to keep a “quality” ranked loss and make our resume strongest possible for the committee
Toki, Hibiki Yamakazi?I know I’ve been drinking BUT…the committee has to want us in now. We are guaranteed eyeballs regardless of opponent. Heck figure out how to put us in vs. the Irish. Everybody wins*
* this post brought to you by Santory
BYU. 10-2 last yearSomebody fact check me, but if we don’t make the playoffs, then we are the only team to win 10 regular season games during each of the last two years without making the playoffs in either year.
Ohio State, Indiana, Oregon, Georgia, and ND won 10 regular season games in each of the last 2 years. Every single one of those teams made the playoffs in each of the last two years.
We won 10 games in each of the last two years as well, except we may not make the playoffs once.
SMFH.
The multiple team tiebreaker for the CFP era should simply be the highest ranked team inwhatever poll makes the most sense. Having Duke in at 8-5 over a top 11-12 team because its opponents won 1 more game is dumb.Which is humiliating for this conference.
Yep… unless you’re SEC/BIG/ND you get screwedBYU. 10-2 last year
Ding, ding, ding.The multiple team tiebreaker for the CFP era should simply be the highest ranked team inwhatever poll makes the most sense. Having Duke in at 8-5 over a top 11-12 team because its opponents won 1 more game is dumb.
I missed that they played UVA. So that makes them 0-2 against good teams. Like I said it its the bad losses by other teams in the conferenceThey played UVA and GT.
And we only have 1 win over teams over .500 in the ACC lmao.
Were 1-1 vs over .500 ACC teams and 5-1 against the others.
The ACC can’t ignore its tiebreaker procedures. Guessing the aggrieved team would seek an injunction and win.