- Joined
- Oct 14, 2018
- Messages
- 3,795
Not the actual board opinions because everyone calling these terrible coaches out is correct. The honeymoon for Diaz is basically over after nearly losing to a near bottom feeder at home. Sorry it's true. And I thought we would honestly get 9-10 games after seeing a lot of positives early. I thought the 'kinks' would get worked out by Enos and Baker would have as remaining as aggressive animals. Neither are true and our punter may be one of the top 5 players on the team.
The worst thing is I realized when reading these threads/posts, etc. and I see member signatures/and/or references to things in the past, 98-99% of the time I only see positive things from over 15 years ago. Outside of the Langham catch against FSU or Bandy's ND interception:
It's an Ed Reed quote in someone's signature, or a reference to Michael Irvin, something about Highsmith or Jerome Brown, or to attitude and fatigues, references to Carlos Jones famous interception, or Edgerrin James UCLA game, My reference to Tremain Mack, or to Santana Moss, something about Gore or obviously remembering Sean Taylor, etc. There is almost NOTHING else left to really discuss in the last 15 years ago based on people's historical referencing on here. This program
used to be known for being innovating with 4 wr concepts with our athletes, or prioritizing speed on defense, or even our training regiment under Moffitt.
Now? All that this program has that is culturally relevant anymore in college football is the retarded turnover chain and now touchdown rings. It's like a caricature onto itself that meaningless trinkets pervade the program and its general attitude (see parallel of players dancing after nearly losing to a bottom feeder at home) and nothing of substance represents this program anymore. In the last 15 years the only imitators we have spawned are people who now have a turnover pencil, backpack, etc. That's it.
The worst thing is I realized when reading these threads/posts, etc. and I see member signatures/and/or references to things in the past, 98-99% of the time I only see positive things from over 15 years ago. Outside of the Langham catch against FSU or Bandy's ND interception:
It's an Ed Reed quote in someone's signature, or a reference to Michael Irvin, something about Highsmith or Jerome Brown, or to attitude and fatigues, references to Carlos Jones famous interception, or Edgerrin James UCLA game, My reference to Tremain Mack, or to Santana Moss, something about Gore or obviously remembering Sean Taylor, etc. There is almost NOTHING else left to really discuss in the last 15 years ago based on people's historical referencing on here. This program
used to be known for being innovating with 4 wr concepts with our athletes, or prioritizing speed on defense, or even our training regiment under Moffitt.
Now? All that this program has that is culturally relevant anymore in college football is the retarded turnover chain and now touchdown rings. It's like a caricature onto itself that meaningless trinkets pervade the program and its general attitude (see parallel of players dancing after nearly losing to a bottom feeder at home) and nothing of substance represents this program anymore. In the last 15 years the only imitators we have spawned are people who now have a turnover pencil, backpack, etc. That's it.
Last edited:
