The worst thing about this nonsense is implicitly represented here

[HughFreezemyCuckoldYesPlz]

How you view me is of zero concern to me, I’m merely questioning the logic or lack there of in trying to make judgements on his ability off of four games. It’s comical actually.

Like I said: you provided no details in any of your arguments. I also don't care about how I view you. But if you want to make some ad hoc nonsensical drivel and ascribe that to being 'logic' with no specifics or details, then you're really wasting your own time.

 

[ajkreider]

Lack of adjustments at half were disappointing - not the game plan going in.

New OC who puts in a new system needs to find out what guys can and can't run. You don't get that from practice. You need to play games. Hopefully, the coaches have seen what they need to see. The oline is very limited, and merely packing in two TEs won't cure all of that. This itself was an adjustment from week 1.

The lack of adjustments in games seems easily changeable. What to do against 8 and 9 in the box seems obvious. We will see. Not ready to run around with my hair on fire. We can beat every left on the schedule. Yes, the even the UVA that was down late to the powerhouse that is ODU. Could probably lose to them all too.

Delayed gratification isn't impossible. Been a fan for long enough (and disappointed enough) to give it to the end of the year.

 

[Swampcity]

Not the actual board opinions because everyone calling these terrible coaches out is correct. The honeymoon for Diaz is basically over after nearly losing to a near bottom feeder at home. Sorry it's true. And I thought we would honestly get 9-10 games after seeing a lot of positives early. I thought the 'kinks' would get worked out by Enos and Baker would have as remaining as aggressive animals. Neither are true and our punter may be one of the top 5 players on the team.

The worst thing is I realized when reading these threads/posts, etc. and I see member signatures/and/or references to things in the past, 98-99% of the time I only see positive things from over 15 years ago. Outside of the Langham catch against FSU or Bandy's ND interception:

It's an Ed Reed quote in someone's signature, or a reference to Michael Irvin, something about Highsmith or Jerome Brown, or to attitude and fatigues, references to Carlos Jones famous interception, or Edgerrin James UCLA game, My reference to Tremain Mack, or to Santana Moss, something about Gore or obviously remembering Sean Taylor, etc. There is almost NOTHING else left to really discuss in the last 15 years ago based on people's historical referencing on here. This program
used to be known for being innovating with 4 wr concepts with our athletes, or prioritizing speed on defense, or even our training regiment under Moffitt.

Now? All that this program has that is culturally relevant anymore in college football is the retarded turnover chain and now touchdown rings. It's like a caricature onto itself that meaningless trinkets pervade the program and its general attitude (see parallel of players dancing after nearly losing to a bottom feeder at home) and nothing of substance represents this program anymore. In the last 15 years the only imitators we have spawned are people who now have a turnover pencil, backpack, etc. That's it.

This is a true indictment of what we have become.

 

[Suhrthing]

Refreshing and original. Would read again.