KevinCaneFace
Senior
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 6,444
Now you're all twisted in knots chasing your tail. Im not trying to justify anything because I think it's wholly possible to be a great QB on a bad team. Elway and Kaaya prove that.
You, on the other hand, have repeatedly espoused the belief that Kaaya can't be considered great because he hasn't won enough. When faced with a clear example of one of the greatest QBs in the history of the game, who led his team to a 20-23 overall record at Stanford, you attempted to excuse your way around your original hypothesis by giving me a few examples of Elway comebacks, pointing out his incredible 6 win season, and excusing away no bowl appearances in 4 years by telling me there weren't many bowl games back then.
This one's over. Someone give Hugh a standing 8 count and let him gather his faculties.
Dude I have no idea what you're saying, but you're right this is over. I don't give a flying **** about any of this. Kaaya had his chances to win us some ball games and he failed. That's the bottom line. Justify by saying well he had the lead and the defense gave it up, or his play calling was terrible, or the wide receivers dropped a pass in the 3rd quarter is fine. Doesn't matter. He had his chances to win us games and he failed. That's it. End of story. Hope it changes next season with some better coaching. See you at the opener.
See the problem there? You can admit that Berrios dropped a wide open touchdown, the defense caved during late leads, bad play calling, etc. Yet you still put the failure on Kaaya. Idiocy at its finest.