- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 5,204
D for not bringing in Buster Faulkner
The sad part is there are 2 posters who think it's a F.
Other than Fields they're not as good at recruiting as I would like, but as a whole I'm very pleased.“A” if you exclude Stubblefield.
“B” with him included.
Really? I cant see how the worst pessimist couldn't at least get to C.Make it 3....
They coach goofy!!! He said what does an OL coach do well. lmaoC.
Defense: has zero recruiters on it, just teachers.
Offense: Enos has potential but most our hoping he learned from Alabama rather than just copy and pastes his CMU-Ark offense. And the rest of the staff are largely question marks with no reputation or bad reputation.
The TE is an elite recruiter. But can anybody tell me what the WR coach does well? What the OL Coach does well? What the RB Coach does well?
Really? I cant see how the worst pessimist couldn't at least get to C.
I did not...and for that I apologize.Dude, I rated the staff an F- for fantastic if you didn't read from page 1..... but in all honesty I give them a "B"... Let's see the product on the field first...
MODSSSSSSSSSS:
Please ban anybody in this thread that went above a "C" grade.
And honestly, even though I'm included in it, maybe even ban anybody that gave the staff a C.
Please promote the 4 people that gave the staff an "F" to "Emperor Mod" status.
Thanks.