CanesFan93
Junior
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 4,315
So what, he’s still a baller regardless and is thickly built as a receiver. 6’1 is not short for receiver and his film is really good
Evan Neal is just monstrous. Over 6'7" and nearly 400.
Crazy thing is Neal is not sloppy at allEvan Neal is just monstrous. Over 6'7" and nearly 400.
And Johnson is up to about 215 lbs now - solid size for a QB - especially one who's still a sophomore.
So what, he’s still a baller regardless and is thickly built as a receiver. 6’1 is not short for receiver and his film is really good
He's 6'0.5 not 6'1. Barley Pope's size.So what, he’s still a baller regardless and is thickly built as a receiver. 6’1 is not short for receiver and his film is really good
You mean height, he has a solid 10-15 pounds on popeHe's 6'0.5 not 6'1. Barley Pope's size.
RightYou mean height, he has a solid 10-15 pounds on pope
Crazy thing is Neal is not sloppy at all
I'm not either. It was just interesting that's all.Count me as not even mildly concerned with Payton being 6'0.5. He has great size and is the total package. He reminds me of Sammy Watkins as a prospect.
5 star IMO
He's 6'0.5 not 6'1. Barley Pope's size.