Whelp? Here we go again. Not sure why we would even show up to play. View attachment 347784
Whelp? Here we go again. Not sure why we would even show up to play. View attachment 347784
We are coming for what is ours. The refs good out 6 natty away and this team will get revenge. Nobody wants to play the canes now NOBODY
What? They aren't going to take an undefeated team in a championship game seriously? StopNo disrespect, but I don't think there's much to take away from either of those games with respect to their offense. Texas was the first game of the year. They were extremely conservative with Sayin making his first start. Bo Jackson got zero carries too. I don't think they took the IU game very seriously, while IU certainly did.
UW and Michigan were there next two lowest scoring games. I'd look to those games and seek to improve on them. If we can hold OSU to closer to 5 YPP and create more havoc plays (OSU only turned the ball over twice and Sayin was sacked just once in those two games), we should be able to limit them to 17-24 points.
The game didn't matter. OSU was getting a bye win or lose. I don't think there's much to take away from that game.What? They aren't going to take an undefeated team in a championship game seriously? Stop
OSU is obviously very good and thanks to Indiana, they showed us theirs a ***** in the armor. Also, let's not take for granted OSU's last game will be 4.5 weeks ago. This is set up for an upset
Lol where do you get that from that they didn’t care about the game?The game didn't matter. OSU was getting a bye win or lose. I don't think there's much to take away from that game.
You're right on the long layoff. That's something we can and hopefully do take advantage of.
No I don't think they did. They got the #2 seed. After they lost. I don't understand why it's controversial to say that a game between #1&2 was meaningless, because when #1 lost they became #2 and still got a bye?Lol where do you get that from that they didn’t care about the game?
Are there quotes like what the Pitt head coach said about the Notre dame game not mattering? Did they rest certain starters?
Did they not care that a loss would put them in a worse seeding therefore making their run to repeat slightly more difficult?
Those are different questions. You said “there was not much to take away from that game.”No I don't think they did. They got the #2 seed. After they lost. I don't understand why it's controversial to say that a game between #1&2 was meaningless, because when #1 lost they became #2 and still got a bye?
Try this thought experiment: If OSU plays IU for the title who are you taking? Me, I am betting a completely irresponsible amount of money on OSU. (Obviously this better not happen cause that means OSU beats us)
Except they have ended up on the far tougher side of the bracket. I believe they have the infrastructure and inside knowledge to know they wanted that 1 seed so they could dodge Miami/ND and the better SEC teamsThe game didn't matter. OSU was getting a bye win or lose. I don't think there's much to take away from that game.
You're right on the long layoff. That's something we can and hopefully do take advantage of.
Fair point.Those are different questions. You said “there was not much to take away from that game.”
I disagree. I think your point about OSU being favored against IU if they played in the title AND there are some things Miami can glean from their conference championship game (my point) can both be true.
If they had rested everyone or even just J Smith I would agree with you.
Carbon copy of what TAMU was doing?Got to think that OSU are going to try to neutralize our advantage on the DLine with quick passes. Trust Hetherman to come up with gameplan to eliminate their run game and take away JS and CL and see if they can beat us with their 3 or 4th wr.
Not putting in maximal effort to stop the threat that Cignetti and a well-financed Indiana operation represents to Ohio States preeminence i that region would be incredibly foolish.Fair point.
I think the biggest takeaway from that game is that OSU's OL can be leaky in pass pro against a good pass rush (like we have in spades). Sayin had only been sacked 6 times before that game. IU sacked him 5 times.
I do think we (and our coaches more importantly) would be better served focusing on games other than the IU game when devising a plan against OSU. That was the strangest 1 vs 2 matchup I have ever seen, since the only consequence to losing was some deck shuffling within the top 4. Granted OSU played their starters the whole game, but I don't think they took that game very seriously.
OSU has more projected 1st rounder on their defense than all of those teams combined in DT McDonald, LB Reese, DB Downs, and and LB Styles.I know we have a long time until the game, but I'll jut make it simple. Unless we are -2 in TO's, we will win this game because of the trenches.
TAMU, UF, ND and Louisville's D's have gotten us ready for this game. I think OSU's D will be tough, but I don't think it will be markedly more difficult than the one we just faced AND the wind won't be blowing.
Not putting in maximal effort to stop the threat that Cignetti and a well-financed Indiana operation represents to Ohio States preeminence i that region would be incredibly foolish.