The Money Myth

Not sure what you want. Moreover, I'm not sure what you think you've proven.

Far as I can tell, you keep relying on **** like the endowment and the momentum campaigns as some sort of be-all-end-all that shows UM "has the money" and is just too cheap to spend it. And again, you simply ignore the fact that A) most of those funds are earmarked B) only 100 mil was raised over a full 6 years for athletics, which is a pitiful amount, and C) the university already subsidizes the athletic department.

We can keep going round and round if you want, but you're really not showing anything more than your ability to maintain a faulty argument.

None of that is what we're talking about.

Here is your quote:

money is, in fact, the reason they won't let him go right now. UM has very little of it, and apparently, according to their cost/benefit analysis, it's cheaper to keep him for next year.

https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/84204-Michigan-s-BOT-vs-Ours/page3
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top