forums

The Jaelen Phillips DQ was fraudulent...

HurricaneAce07

HurricaneAce07

Class of 2007
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
786
So JP15's first unsportsmanlike flag was for excessive celebration. He ran down the field and celebrated with his teammates at the edge of the end zone. SUPER ticky tacky if you ask me, but I can see it being called.

HOWEVER, the refs completely whiffed on the second unsportsmanlike penalty on Jaelen. After the tackle Bradley Jennings Jr (#44) kicks Lucas' helmet intentionally and Phillips walks into it without even seeing it and foots it (again, without even seeing it). Refs toss the flag on Phillips and he's done for the night. I could see a flag being thrown on Jennings, but definitely not Phillips there.

Go to 1:21:11 in the replay:


Phillips is obviously upset not because he screwed up, but because he DIDN'T ***** up and should have been able to finish out the game.
 
Advertisement
ilovelamp51 said:
Lesson learned. Now act like you’ve been there.

LEAD, not talk. He will be just fine
Click to expand...
I actually loved seeing Ed Reed walking and talking to Phillips, they laughed and you could see by the end that all necessary lessons had been learned. And then Phillips greeting teammates in the tunnel coming into halftime. He’s special as a player and leader.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
I wish there was a full vid of the incident but you clearly see Jennings kick the helmet first.
 
I love the emotion but a ball spike and helmet kick are both third rails...I think the line judge even tried to ignore the ball spike but it was a chippy game, you can’t let those go...I imagine if they had the refs would have their own pile to deal with later this week
 
We blew out FSU and our best defensive lineman got the night off. I noticed he was wearing something on his knee- probably from that cheap shot at Louisville. Rest him up. Need him at 100% the rest of the season
 
Advertisement
Even though he was DQ, he should have gone to locker room for 2 unsportsmanship penalties. On the other hand #21 for FSU was ejected for targeting. He should have been banished to locker room. He wasn't. He was on sideline rest of game. Refs were Cane Haters.
 
Florido said:
Even though he was DQ, he should have gone to locker room for 2 unsportsmanship penalties. On the other hand #21 for FSU was ejected for targeting. He should have been banished to locker room. He wasn't. He was on sideline rest of game. Refs were Cane Haters.
Click to expand...
That’s a rule change. If you get ejected with targeting you can stay on the sideline. New this year.
 
Matthew_Suero said:
That’s a rule change. If you get ejected with targeting you can stay on the sideline. New this year.
Click to expand...
Florido said:
Even though he was DQ, he should have gone to locker room for 2 unsportsmanship penalties. On the other hand #21 for FSU was ejected for targeting. He should have been banished to locker room. He wasn't. He was on sideline rest of game. Refs were Cane Haters.
Click to expand...
Edit, left out NOT.......Even though he was DQ, he should NOT have gone to locker room........
 
Advertisement
Florido said:
Even though he was DQ, he should have gone to locker room for 2 unsportsmanship penalties. On the other hand #21 for FSU was ejected for targeting. He should have been banished to locker room. He wasn't. He was on sideline rest of game. Refs were Cane Haters.
Click to expand...
My guy they explained that **** for two hours lol
 
Go Canes!! said:
This is a 30 year long issue for us and it will never change, even if we leave the ACC for another conference.

He's doesn't have to sit the first half against Clemson. To me that's all that matters.
Click to expand...
Thanks .... I was wondering if he’d have to sit out a half. Glad that’s not the case!!
 
Advertisement
Back
Top