:fistbump2:Might want to delete this thread and deny it ever existed. No matter the brain power of our illustrious posters, not sure that any of us should be commenting on which 19, 20, 21 years should or shouldn't be on scholarship. Seems demeaning to the kids and their family. Leave such decisions for the coaches to quietly resolve.
And just stick to ****ing all over the program, the uniform manufacturer, the stadium, the coaches, and presidents and athletic directors past and present.
think they are done with the restrictions you speak of.
nevermind then mods delete this thread
I remember Gray Crow was Fisch's first offer at QB.....lol
I remember Gray Crow was Fisch's first offer at QB.....lol
yup and preston dewey was the future stud lol. Coley has proven a better judge of talent.
think they are done with the restrictions you speak of.
nevermind then mods delete this thread
we still have scholarship reductions until 2016.
think they are done with the restrictions you speak of.
nevermind then mods delete this thread
we still have scholarship reductions until 2016.
Didn't we use 7 of the 9 we were hit with last year allowing us to use 1 in 2016 class and the last one in 2017.No reason to be anywhere 78-80 like we always seem to be under Golden.
Might want to delete this thread and deny it ever existed. No matter the brain power of our illustrious posters, not sure that any of us should be commenting on which 19, 20, 21 years should or shouldn't be on scholarship. Seems demeaning to the kids and their family. Leave such decisions for the coaches to quietly resolve.
And just stick to ****ing all over the program, the uniform manufacturer, the stadium, the coaches, and presidents and athletic directors past and present.
No, no I disagree.
Take your skirt off and understand that college football is a business just like any other. If this type of thread hurts your feelings then perhaps you should delete your existence instead of telling others what to do on a college football message board you...you Hurricane Athletic Department apologist man.
College football maybe a bussiness but your talking about kids education. THE U is about more than the football program regardless if people wanna hear it. Isnt a public ****hole state school like they have up in Gville and Tally. Rooting for kids who've done nothing wrong, and likely have no future in pro sports to lose there scholorships and education is just dirty. A player might get pushed out every once in awhile but to just go down a roster a pluck the least talented players and say **** off will never ever happen. And if it did that school/admin would deal with repercusions for a long time. Not the kind of publicity or reputation you want.
another classless thread.
think they are done with the restrictions you speak of.
nevermind then mods delete this thread
we still have scholarship reductions until 2016.
Class and winning are not mutually exclusive.
another classless thread.
another classless thread.
Good Post...Might want to delete this thread and deny it ever existed. No matter the brain power of our illustrious posters, not sure that any of us should be commenting on which 19, 20, 21 years should or shouldn't be on scholarship. Seems demeaning to the kids and their family. Leave such decisions for the coaches to quietly resolve.
And just stick to ****ing all over the program, the uniform manufacturer, the stadium, the coaches, and presidents and athletic directors past and present.
Good Post...Might want to delete this thread and deny it ever existed. No matter the brain power of our illustrious posters, not sure that any of us should be commenting on which 19, 20, 21 years should or shouldn't be on scholarship. Seems demeaning to the kids and their family. Leave such decisions for the coaches to quietly resolve.
And just stick to ****ing all over the program, the uniform manufacturer, the stadium, the coaches, and presidents and athletic directors past and present.