- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 36,638
5-7 sounds right.
If they both have good years, I can see somewhere around the 3rd round would be my guess.
If they both have good years, I can see somewhere around the 3rd round would be my guess.
Walton? Yes. Yearby? **** no! Even with a family.You could add Walton and Yearby to that list but they have families so I do see why they left.
Pinckney and Quarterman BOTH stayed for their senior year and expect to win indicates to me that they know their teammates potential, new coaches abilities and have high expectations for 2019. If they had serious doubts they were both good enough to consider the draft but stayed with their team. That is so Hurricane I like that. No reason than that we fans should have equal expectations.
Won't happen in Diaz's scheme. Unless the stat guys start getting more generous with giving credit for "assisted tackles".I can dig it...I need for those two to obtain 100 tackles a piece this year..is that too much?
Won't happen in Diaz's scheme. Unless the stat guys start getting more generous with giving credit for "assisted tackles".
That was not going to happen
OriginalGatorHater said:
It shows they didn't want to end up undrafted.
Yeah EVERYONE thought the same thing about Willis.......then it happened
NO ONE can predict the draft.....best you can say is odds are that xyz happens
Willis is a bizarre exception.
YES sometimes even bizarre :****: happens in the draft........NOTHING is guaranteed to happen
I learned that startling fact when Willis ACTUALLY went undrafted.....and will NEVER forget it
My point is that virtually 100% of the reasonable people you talk to, that are knowledgeable, would say they would’ve gotten drafted this past draft.
Obviously not in the higher rounds anyway, or at least that would’ve been unlikely.
I think Willis is just so far outside the curve, just one one of those once every 10 year type exceptions.
There’s almost no reason he should’ve gone undrafted, but we've discussed that ad nauseam. Suffice it to say that from the point of his last game, to and through draft day, Willis did everything wrong. Literally everything. He had zero guidance, or I should say zero good guidance, from his agents and handlers. Literally did everything wrong.
That’s why Willis is just not a good example. Seventh round management did him no favors
Its anyone's prerogative whether they want to believe that:****: never or rarely happens...we all know about stats and outliers...but fact is ..outliers do exist...I now know that even the most bizarre :****: can happen
Looking back, we've ALL had plenty of warnings that even the bizarre can happen when least expected.
The Fiesta Bowl, NCSU vs.Houston, App State vs. Michigan, Maryland not being able to come back against Miami down 31 points, and numerous "Can't miss" prospects missing
Maryland gets a miracle in Miami | November 10, 1984 | HISTORY
On November 10, 1984, the University of Maryland’s backup quarterback Frank Reich throws six touchdown passes against...www.history.com
I've learned over the years to adjust my life and bets accordingly ( based on what and how much I can truly afford to lose) .....and realize that NOTHING is a sure thing...UNTIL IT HAPPENS
Since y’all think this **** funny How much y’all wanna bet that Shaq and Pinckney both going in the 1st next NFL draft?
Life is just one big decision tree. If you’re smart you always pick the branch with the highest probability. But there are never any certainties. There’s no certainty the sun comes up tomorrow. There’s a minuscule possibility that world is dead tomorrow morning because an earth killing asteroid hits us tonight.
So I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. It was a high probability, in my mind anyway, a 99% chance that both those guys would’ve gotten drafted last April. Most people would agree. People are virtually 100% sure on Shaq, somewhat slightly less than 100% on Pinckney. It’s just that everyone was pretty much in agreement that they would get drafted NOT in the higher, but lower, rounds
My point is simple and straightforward,
So is mine.
It’s the fundamental difference between possibility, probability, and certainty.
Nothing is certain.
Virtually anything is possible.
Everything else is assigned range of probabilities, from low to high.
Generally, intelligent discussion involves the assignation of a range of probabilities.
Obstinate and unreasonable debaters focus on the improbable as a touchstone debating point, when in fact, it weakens their original premise.
Cheers.