forums

Tennessee Nebraska Miami and USC

Go Canes!! said:
The three most fertile recruiting states are Florida, Texas and California.

USC, UCLA, Texas, Texas AM, USC, UCLA, Miami, FSU and UF are a combined 10 games over .500.
Click to expand...

This is a great post. Fertile recruiting ground doesn't mean nearly what it used to mean. The days of Miami expected to be good because of the talent in our backyard is ancient history. We might land more than the average P5 4* South Florida kids out of proximity, but the top 5* talent isn't sticking around Miami to go 8-4 when Nick Saban's helicopter is landing on his football field.
 
Advertisement
Cane since 1060 said:
Wow some of you just cant get out of dreamland. We are far ahead of what. Who have we beaten to proclaim we are any better than common if even that sheesh.
Click to expand...
Nebraska is like 1-7 or 2-6 on the year
Tennessee has 5 plus losses this year
USC with all of the elite talent they get year in and year out with virtually no competition in terms of going after recruits they want they still manage to lose 4 or more games **** near every year.
 
Cane since 1060 said:
The first two once prolific programs are a complete dumpster fire. The next two are just above that. Other high profile programs have found their footing with mild setbacks. The state of the U is in flux and in this town it won't fly. To ex players it wont fly. Fans will simply not support average thats why the banners must fly before it gets any worse.
CMR said he came here primarily because of the fertile recruiting grounds and we are #25 at rivals.com. so who is fooling who.
Click to expand...

Nebraska will pass everyone else on this list very quickly.
 
We're a campfire. Not quite as impressive as a dumpster fire, but a little more impressive than a grill fire.
 
Tetragrammaton Cane said:
TN looks like their headed in the right direction and quickly; OP was wrong to include them. USC and Miami look lost.

Recruiting 2019: #14 TN, #20 Miami, #22 Nebraska, #27 USC.
Click to expand...
Usc always start their recruiting classes off slow but close really strong
 
Go Canes!! said:
The three most fertile recruiting states are Florida, Texas and California.

USC, UCLA, Texas, Texas AM, USC, UCLA, Miami, FSU and UF are a combined 10 games over .500.
Click to expand...

It is called Parity. The NCAA loves it and doesn't mind if Bama and Clemson have loopholes so long as the rest of the teams are all fighting to keep fans engaged. Once enough fans become disenfranchised, the NCAA will see the error of their ways OR the FBI/Courts will step in to force changes. I have a feeling it will be the later of those which leads to pay for play in BB/FB. Depending on Frents, Miami could either become elite again as the pay for play has kids playing in Miami vs. Bama. OR Miami could decide to avoid it to become part of a new "ivy league" of college sports that actually attempts to enforce rules.
 
brock said:
Nebraska is like 1-7 or 2-6 on the year
Tennessee has 5 plus losses this year
USC with all of the elite talent they get year in and year out with virtually no competition in terms of going after recruits they want they still manage to lose 4 or more games **** near every year.
Click to expand...
The point is that USCw has far more talent than the schools they've lost to. It doesn't matter that they barely have competition to land that talent.

The same can be said for Miami outside of LSU. No good reason for us to have lost to Pitt, Wisconsin, UVA or BC within the last two years. That's the point. Better talent than your opponents and still losing.
 
RiDLer80 said:
The point is that USCw has far more talent than the schools they've lost to. It doesn't matter that they barely have competition to land that talent.

The same can be said for Miami outside of LSU. No good reason for us to have lost to Pitt, Wisconsin, UVA or BC within the last two years. That's the point. Better talent than your opponents and still losing.
Click to expand...
I agree with that in terms of we shouldn’t have loss to those teams But usc’s talent advantage is even more apparent than Miami’s when you look at the way they have recruited top 5 Nationally over a number years, we’ve only been close to that mark what 2 times since 2008?
 
Advertisement
brock said:
I agree with that in terms of we shouldn’t have loss to those teams But usc’s talent advantage is even more apparent than Miami’s when you look at the way they have recruited top 5 Nationally over a number years, we’ve only been close to that mark what 2 times since 2008?
Click to expand...
Compliments of @Thread Killa

2018 BC class: 71st overall, 14th in the ACC
2017 BC class: 67th overall, 13th in the ACC
2016 BC class: 78th overall, 14th in the ACC
2015 BC class: 60th overall, 14th in the ACC


2018 UVA class: 60th overall, 11th in the ACC
2017 UVA class: 58th overall, 12th in the ACC
2016 UVA class: 63rd overall, 13th in the ACC
2015 UVA class: 50th overall, 10th in the ACC


2018 Miami class: 8th overall, 2nd in the ACC
2017 Miami class: 12th overall, 2nd in the ACC
2016 Miami class: 22nd overall, 3rd in the ACC
2015 Miami class: 27th overall, 3rd in the ACC

Don't talk to me about USC's talent advantage like we didn't have the exact same talent advantage over BC and UVA.
 
Lol at the program being regarded as above a dumpster fire. That's a real knee slapper.
 
RiDLer80 said:
Compliments of @Thread Killa

2018 BC class: 71st overall, 14th in the ACC
2017 BC class: 67th overall, 13th in the ACC
2016 BC class: 78th overall, 14th in the ACC
2015 BC class: 60th overall, 14th in the ACC


2018 UVA class: 60th overall, 11th in the ACC
2017 UVA class: 58th overall, 12th in the ACC
2016 UVA class: 63rd overall, 13th in the ACC
2015 UVA class: 50th overall, 10th in the ACC


2018 Miami class: 8th overall, 2nd in the ACC
2017 Miami class: 12th overall, 2nd in the ACC
2016 Miami class: 22nd overall, 3rd in the ACC
2015 Miami class: 27th overall, 3rd in the ACC

Don't talk to me about USC's talent advantage like we didn't have the exact same talent advantage over BC and UVA.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? I said we shouldn’t have lossed to those teams clearly, and there is a stark difference in Miami averaging 17th best class in the country in terms of recruiting the last 4 years and usc averaging top 5 or in the same time span. So overall they have brought even more talent in than Miami and are still losing just as much if not more
 
Last edited:
MiamiHotline said:
Lol at the program being regarded as above a dumpster fire. That's a real knee slapper.
Click to expand...
We were ranked in the top 10 for majority of the season last year including all the way up to #2 in the playoffs all the way up to the last regular season game of the season. Just went to a New Year 6 bowl last year and have the 2nd best record in the Acc(over 68 % win percentage since 2014 in conference games, and just come off of recruiting our best recruiting class in the last 10 years so yes we may have faltered this year but we are far from a dumpster fire.
 
brock said:
What are you talking about? I said we shouldn’t have lossed to those teams clearly, and there is a stark difference in Miami averaging 17th best class in the country in terms of recruiting the last 4 years and usc averaging top 5 or in the same time span. So overall they have brought even more talent in than Miami and are still just as much if not more
Click to expand...
So what that USC gets top 5 classes? The point is Miami has a similarly wide talent gap against its opponents that USC does. When our opponents aren't bringing in any blue chip talent and half our classes are blue chips or better than 5th vs 17th in the country is irrelevant.
 
brock said:
We were ranked in the top 10 for majority of the season last year including all the way up to #2 in the playoffs all the way up to the last regular season game of the season. Just went to a New Year 6 bowl last year and have the 2nd best record in the Acc(over 68 % win percentage since 2014 in conference games, and just come off of recruiting our best recruiting class in the last 10 years so yes we may have faltered this year but we are far from a dumpster fire.
Click to expand...
Let's see, in the span of a year:

Here is what happened after beating Notre Dame:

Beat by unranked Pitt who went 5-7
Brains beat in by Clemson in the ACCCG
Lost to Wisconsin in the Orange bowl, which was a home game for Miami

Ran out of Jerry World by LSU
Barely beat the worst FSU team in 20 years
Lost to unranked Virginia
Lost to unranked Boston college

6-6 since Miami beat Notre Dame last year

After all these facts, you want to sit here and tell me this is not a dumpster fire?

tenor.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Advertisement
MiamiHotline said:
Let's see, in the span of a year:

Here is what happened after beating Notre Dame:

Beat by unranked Pitt who went 5-7
Brains beat in by Clemson in the ACCCG
Lost to Wisconsin in the Orange bowl, which was a home game for Miami

Ran out of Jerry World by LSU
Barely beat the worst FSU team in 20 years
Lost to unranked Virginia
Lost to unranked Boston college

6-9 since Miami beat Notre Dame last year

After all these facts, you want to sit here and tell me this is not a dumpster fire?

tenor.gif
Click to expand...
We’ve only lost 6 games in the 2017 and 2018 season so far combined how in the **** are we 6-9 since Notre Dame?
 
brock said:
We were ranked in the top 10 for majority of the season last year including all the way up to #2 in the playoffs all the way up to the last regular season game of the season. Just went to a New Year 6 bowl last year and have the 2nd best record in the Acc(over 68 % win percentage since 2014 in conference games, and just come off of recruiting our best recruiting class in the last 10 years so yes we may have faltered this year but we are far from a dumpster fire.
Click to expand...

Were worse then a dumpster fire.
 
brock said:
We’ve only lost 6 games in the 2017 and 2018 season so far combined how in the **** are we 6-9 since Notre Dame?
Click to expand...
That was suppose to be a 6, but none the less.

Losses after notes dame when everybody said The U was bacm

Loss against Pitt
Loss against Clemson
Loss against Wisky
Loss against LSU
Loss against Virgina
Loss against BC.

Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

Also, did you really try to hang your hat on a 67% wins in the ACC of all conferences? Lol.
 
Back
Top