Huh? I never said anything about 4* or 5* players, so I have no idea why you’re babbling about that?
You said Utah’s WRs sucked. They sucked before, during, and after Stubblefield. So he shouldn’t get the blame for that. He can’t make chicken salad out of chicken sh*t. That’s fair enough. We will put the these horrible receivers on the previous WR coach that identified them and brought them in.
What I’m asking is what receivers did Stubblefield bring in to address this problem? If you don’t have any talent at a position, the solution is to bring in talent? Who did he bring in? How did they do? Even after him, as long as he recruited them, we’ll give him credit. I don’t care what their star ranking was. How did the guys he picked to help this dire WR situation, perform at Utah?
Who cares? Its a school that can't recruit good players. How the heck am I suppose to know what players he brought in? If he brought in a stud DE or LB does that not matter. As I said, recruiting is rarely about one person. It's about your program and the totality of the staff going after a player. Oh and how much BS lies you're willing to tell a kid and his family. My point is this, recruiting isn't a problem at the U. The talent is there. Coaching has been the issue. So why are you worried about recruiting, you should be worried about whether these guys can scheme and coach. Period. Its the U, the kids come when you aren't that good, everyone will want to come if you start really winning.
Had there been in influx of 4* WR before or after Stubblefield I would question him. They have had one player who could have went someone better than Utah at the WR spot in the past 5 years. Every other kid, Utah was prob their best offer.