Number1CanesFan
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Messages
- 12,523
The article points that out if you read itSmh I find that unfathomable
The article points that out if you read itSmh I find that unfathomable
No worries; all good.My bad. The spell check failed me.
This is not about being a fan of one school over another. It's about providing a standard of safety and a level playing field for competition.No worries ; all good.
I'm of course a Canes fan, but also a Big Syracuse guy [so maybe I'm just a wee bit sensitive that way ... LOL].
Have a Great Day !!
T here is a reason Clemson and Bama ownNO. You have missed the point entirely. Quite frankly your response is just ignorant. Ignoring thin increased health risk, not having a uniform policy can create a competitive advantage for some teams over others. With our great UM heathcare and support of the school president, I would expect Miami to be at a competitive disadvantage because I believe UM will test more than other schools, resulting in more players sitting out giving an advantage to our opponents because of no uniform testing policy.
I'm sorry. I just gave you an opinion on whether schools in specific states would be playing college football this year. I also said no matter what the league does they will not play outside of a bubble environment. I also don't believe I listed Florida as one of the states in question.NO. You have missed the point entirely. Quite frankly your response is just ignorant. Ignoring thin increased health risk, not having a uniform policy can create a competitive advantage for some teams over others. With our great UM heathcare and support of the school president, I would expect Miami to be at a competitive disadvantage because I believe UM will test more than other schools, resulting in more players sitting out giving an advantage to our opponents because of no uniform testing policy.
What does that have to do with safety and fair competition? I think your posts should be in a different thread.T here is a reason Clemson and Bama own
I'm sorry. I just gave you an opinion on whether schools in specific states would be playing college football this year. I also said no matter what the league does they will not play outside of a bubble environment. I also don't believe I listed Florida as one of the states in question.
Thanks for telling me how I should react to your post. MY Point was that in my opinion there will not be college football in the states I listed Regardless of testing protocals. Nothing more. All your talk about competitive advantage is great and all, but not the point of my retort. You mentioned Syracuse players and I indiscreetly snuck in that clleges in NY, among other states would not be playing this year. In my opinion.What does that have to do with safety and fair competition? I think your posts should be in a different thread.
Are you sure the acc doesn’t have a policy? Or is the acc policy simply for less testing than Syracuse’s policy?The Big10 and SEC have theirs in place. The ACC is slipping.
Decisions like this are all about the culture your head coach has implemented. You see teams like Ohio State rallying together and Miami has been business as usual. Then, you have teams like Syracuse who obviously lack a strong culture.
Huh?This is not about being a fan of one school over another. It's about providing a standard of safety and a level playing field for competition.
Let me clarify as I stated in the OP. The ACC does not have frequent testing in their policy. All P5 conferences should have the same policy. This is a bigger failure by the NCAA in not setting rules and protocols for Covid-19 that everyone must meet.Are you sure the acc doesn’t have a policy? Or is the acc policy simply for less testing than Syracuse’s policy?
So the acc does have a policy that all acc teams except Syracuse are OK with. That’s completely different than the way you promoted it throughout this thread.Let me clarify as I stated in the OP. The ACC does not have frequent testing in their policy.