Stanford about to go all in?

Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
9,820

If Cal, Duke, and Stanford decide to fully commit to football, the SEC gonna take another hit.

Those schools got DIFFERENT kind of money, but they still want to preserve their academic tradition. But with Andrew Luck running the show at Stanford now, you gonna start to see them magically start finding the funds to compete with the big boys.

Good buddy of mine in the tech field (SMU alum) said this ain't no vanity gig for Luck either. He's pretty much living at the University and traveling with the team.

Money wise, the SEC cannot compete with the ACC or Big 10. ****, they might not even be on the Big 12 level these days either.
 
Advertisement

If Cal, Duke, and Stanford decide to fully commit to football, the SEC gonna take another hit.

Those schools got DIFFERENT kind of money, but they still want to preserve their academic tradition. But with Andrew Luck running the show at Stanford now, you gonna start to see them magically start finding the funds to compete with the big boys.

Good buddy of mine in the tech field (SMU alum) said this ain't no vanity gig for Luck either. He's pretty much living at the University and traveling with the team.

Money wise, the SEC cannot compete with the ACC or Big 10. ****, they might not even be on the Big 12 level these days either.
Then I guess the Ivy League is gearing up to become THE Super Conference.

 
Advertisement

If Cal, Duke, and Stanford decide to fully commit to football, the SEC gonna take another hit.

Those schools got DIFFERENT kind of money, but they still want to preserve their academic tradition. But with Andrew Luck running the show at Stanford now, you gonna start to see them magically start finding the funds to compete with the big boys.

Good buddy of mine in the tech field (SMU alum) said this ain't no vanity gig for Luck either. He's pretty much living at the University and traveling with the team.

Money wise, the SEC cannot compete with the ACC or Big 10. ****, they might not even be on the Big 12 level these days either.
Music to my ears. I’m sick of the SEC!
 

If Cal, Duke, and Stanford decide to fully commit to football, the SEC gonna take another hit.

Those schools got DIFFERENT kind of money, but they still want to preserve their academic tradition. But with Andrew Luck running the show at Stanford now, you gonna start to see them magically start finding the funds to compete with the big boys.

Good buddy of mine in the tech field (SMU alum) said this ain't no vanity gig for Luck either. He's pretty much living at the University and traveling with the team.

Money wise, the SEC cannot compete with the ACC or Big 10. ****, they might not even be on the Big 12 level these days either.
It not just about money, it's about culture and roster building. you can have all the money in the world and still put together a bad roster. They do not concern me. Jim Harbaugh isnt walking back through Stanford's door
 
Then I guess the Ivy League is gearing up to become THE Super Conference.



Not to go on a rant, but this is such a terrible take of a twitter post. Endowments are set up to generate interest payments so that there can be a steady stream of money. You need a lot of money that doesn't go anywhere to do that. I'm also pretty sure a lot of it can't be legally touched.

The second thing is the money the government is giving them is for research purposes. The government does that because the money they put in is assumed to be received back through innovation breakthroughs. I don't think most people understand how accelerated medical breakthroughs have become due to higher ed funding. You walk into a hospital today and the vast majority of that tech and knowledge has been generated by medical grant research through colleges, either directly or indirectly.

In a free market, nobody is going to care about pumping money into doing cancer or neurodegenerative disease research with very little yield other than the continuation of knowledge for the human race. But for people with that disease it could be life changing. I hear people complain all the time that medical companies just want to keep you alive, not cure the disease, because it's financially better for them. As someone once said, the government and government spending is supposed to fill the gaps that the free market won't touch or shouldn't touch.
 
It not just about money, it's about culture and roster building. you can have all the money in the world and still put together a bad roster. They do not concern me. Jim Harbaugh isnt walking back through Stanford's door
That's where guys like Luck come into play. These things don't happen over night, and no, it's not just about the money, but let's be clear, it all begins and doesn't happen WITHOUT the money and financial investment.
 
I don't think Cal belongs in your argument, OP. That athletic department has been a disaster for quite some time and you don't have the big money boosters super invested in the football team. Shame too because I've been to a couple games and it's a great atmosphere with a student fanbase waiting for the team to be good.
 
I don't think Cal belongs in your argument, OP. That athletic department has been a disaster for quite some time and you don't have the big money boosters super invested in the football team. Shame too because I've been to a couple games and it's a great atmosphere with a student fanbase waiting for the team to be good.
It's a pretty cool place. Their Olympic sports are crazy, it'll be interesting how this effects them.
 
Advertisement
Not to go on a rant, but this is such a terrible take of a twitter post. Endowments are set up to generate interest payments so that there can be a steady stream of money. You need a lot of money that doesn't go anywhere to do that. I'm also pretty sure a lot of it can't be legally touched.

The second thing is the money the government is giving them is for research purposes. The government does that because the money they put in is assumed to be received back through innovation breakthroughs. I don't think most people understand how accelerated medical breakthroughs have become due to higher ed funding. You walk into a hospital today and the vast majority of that tech and knowledge has been generated by medical grant research through colleges, either directly or indirectly.

In a free market, nobody is going to care about pumping money into doing cancer or neurodegenerative disease research with very little yield other than the continuation of knowledge for the human race. But for people with that disease it could be life changing. I hear people complain all the time that medical companies just want to keep you alive, not cure the disease, because it's financially better for them. As someone once said, the government and government spending is supposed to fill the gaps that the free market won't touch or shouldn't touch.
Don't want to delve into TH topics...

Every single penny of an endowment relieves pressures/increases purchasing power in other budgetary line items.
 
It not just about money, it's about culture and roster building. you can have all the money in the world and still put together a bad roster. They do not concern me. Jim Harbaugh isnt walking back through Stanford's door
Its about the money.

Let's not kid ourselves.

If CFB doesn't act quickly with program/salary cap, there won't be much left vs what exists today.
 
Not to go on a rant, but this is such a terrible take of a twitter post. Endowments are set up to generate interest payments so that there can be a steady stream of money. You need a lot of money that doesn't go anywhere to do that. I'm also pretty sure a lot of it can't be legally touched.

The second thing is the money the government is giving them is for research purposes. The government does that because the money they put in is assumed to be received back through innovation breakthroughs. I don't think most people understand how accelerated medical breakthroughs have become due to higher ed funding. You walk into a hospital today and the vast majority of that tech and knowledge has been generated by medical grant research through colleges, either directly or indirectly.

In a free market, nobody is going to care about pumping money into doing cancer or neurodegenerative disease research with very little yield other than the continuation of knowledge for the human race. But for people with that disease it could be life changing. I hear people complain all the time that medical companies just want to keep you alive, not cure the disease, because it's financially better for them. As someone once said, the government and government spending is supposed to fill the gaps that the free market won't touch or shouldn't touch.
That Twitter post is just rage bait for the dumbest people alive who have decided schools like Harvard are a negative to society.
 
Back
Top