I've been saying this for a couple of years. Our "formation" or our "method" of blocking is terrible. About half of our punts look like they were ALMOST blocked. I don't understand the methodology behind "let's give wide gaps between blockers" that allows the defense to get momentum from shooting the gaps. Or if I DO understand the methodology (I believe it is supposed to allow our blockers to read-and-react to the rushers and move around as necessary), we are certainly EXECUTING the plan worse than just about any team in the country.
I have seen teams with tight formations prevent the defenders from getting close. I have seen teams with wide formations prevent the defenders from getting close. I would prefer to see a tight formation, because you tend to have fewer guys having the speed/momentum to get close to the punter.
What is wrong with a tight formation with TWO mid-deep blockers who could either block a free runner from the perimeter or stop a guy who manages to break free up the middle? THREE is too many.
Feagles is clearly rattled by all the pressure. Sure, he needs to learn how to handle pressure better. And he is not a BAD punter, he is an INCONSISTENT punter. Spicer wasn't much better.
But our special teams suck. Outside of having an other-worldly return guy like Jeff Thomas run past everyone, our blocking schemes on our kickoff returns, punt returns, and punting teams SUCK. The only thing we manage to do with any consistency is kick FGs and PATs.
Oh, and by the way, over the past couple of years we have had a TON of short punts that landed inside the 20 because we have struggled on 3rd down and we haven't had a guy who can kick 60 yard FGs. So let's not forget about that, either, when the Nintendo All-Americans try to analyze our average punting yardage.
.