forums

Off-Topic Sound of Freedom

canes732 said:
It’s more exposing the public to the fact the USA is the global leader in it. Normal think it’s a 3rd world problem when in reality your country is run by Pedos
Click to expand...
You'd be surprised how many problems 1st world countries that absolutely should not be associated with 1st world countries.

Interestingly enough, its countries where the Catholic Church, an institution well-known for causing problems, supporting and protecting pedophiles and pedophilia with no repercussions whatsoever, is big.

Its a power thing. Its a big power thing.
 
Advertisement
Curious - why is this movie controversial? It's hardly the first movie to be about child *** trafficking - there are TONS of movies about the subject. Is it because the subject of the movie is of questionable repute and the guy playing him is a qanon whack job? If so, that hardly should make this movie controversial. It is what it is - another movie about child *** trafficking.
 
AUcane said:
Curious - why is this movie controversial? It's hardly the first movie to be about child *** trafficking - there are TONS of movies about the subject. Is it because the subject of the movie is of questionable repute and the guy playing him is a qanon whack job? If so, that hardly should make this movie controversial. It is what it is - another movie about child *** trafficking.
Click to expand...
This is why:
www.rawstory.com

Actor promotes Trump's movie screening by pushing QAnon's bizarre infant blood-drinking theory

Actor Jim Caviezel pushed a QAnon conspiracy theory that liberals drink the blood of infants ahead of a film screening with former President Donald Trump.On Thursday, Caviezel told conservative podcast host Steve Bannon he had a message for Trump about the screening of "Sound of Freedom," a...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

"When you are scared, you've produced adrenaline," he told an audience. "If a child knows he's going to die, his body will secrete this adrenaline, and they have a lot of terms that they use."

"But it's the worst horror I've ever seen, is adrenochroming, even if I never, ever, ever, ever saw it," he asserted.

Jim is tiptoeing on the line of lunacy and sanity.
 
Mike Thot said:
This is why:
www.rawstory.com

Actor promotes Trump's movie screening by pushing QAnon's bizarre infant blood-drinking theory

Actor Jim Caviezel pushed a QAnon conspiracy theory that liberals drink the blood of infants ahead of a film screening with former President Donald Trump.On Thursday, Caviezel told conservative podcast host Steve Bannon he had a message for Trump about the screening of "Sound of Freedom," a...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

"When you are scared, you've produced adrenaline," he told an audience. "If a child knows he's going to die, his body will secrete this adrenaline, and they have a lot of terms that they use."

"But it's the worst horror I've ever seen, is adrenochroming, even if I never, ever, ever, ever saw it," he asserted.
Click to expand...

Yeah, like I said, Civiezal has fallen off the deep end. That should not take away from the content of the movie that he is acting in imo. I still consider him a fine actor.
 
Advertisement
AUcane said:
Yeah, like I said, Civiezal has fallen off the deep end. That should not take away from the content of the movie that he is acting in imo. I still consider him a fine actor.
Click to expand...
he is a fine actor. but how often do people especially when sensitive political topics are involved separate the art from the artist? especially in the current political climate. it is taking away from the content of the movie.
 
AUcane said:
Yeah, like I said, Civiezal has fallen off the deep end. That should not take away from the content of the movie that he is acting in imo. I still consider him a fine actor.
Click to expand...
I think you can separate the art and the artist. Just because you enjoy art made by a lunatic/psychopath/etc does not mean you support their views or ideas. You can watch this movie and say "This bat**** insane lunatic can ******* act!" without supporting or justifying any of his beliefs.
 
Mike Thot said:
he is a fine actor. but how often do people especially when sensitive political topics are involved separate the art from the artist? especially in the current political climate. it is taking away from the content of the movie.
Click to expand...

No doubt. But why is this a politically sensitive topic?
 
AUcane said:
Yeah, like I said, Civiezal has fallen off the deep end. That should not take away from the content of the movie that he is acting in imo. I still consider him a fine actor.
Click to expand...
It truly is amazing how many people that you would never suspect have "fallen off the deep end". I have a very good friend who was the head of a executive business council in a major city ... balanced, level headed, conservative. Fast forward 15 years ... had dinner with her recently and she "went down the rabbit hole" in her words ... starts her day with 90 minutes on Tik Tok ... swears JFK Jr is alive and will appear with Trump to lead the country. Talked about "andrenochroming" an alleged "common practice amongst the Ruling Elites". Talked about prison camps in Gitmo where "criminals against mankind" like Michael Moore, have been taken, put on trial and into prison for life (or executed). Then replaced in society with "doubles" pending the rise of JFK Jr paired with Donald Trump. The Ruling Elites and child *** trafficking, and worse, are a common theme.
 
Advertisement
AUcane said:
Yeah, I don't get it. I'm sure 60 mins has run countless of these types of stories. ****, Ashton Kutcher has been on Capitol Hill talking about this issue.

How did this get politicized? Did it get politicized by the right or the left?
Click to expand...
I think @Mike Thot has it right. It's probably because of Caviezel.

Of course, it wouldn't take much to change the narrative into it being an apolitical issue, but the silence of anyone in a position to influence is deafening.
 
JD08 said:
I think @Mike Thot has it right. It's probably because of Caviezel.

Of course, it wouldn't take much to change the narrative into it being an apolitical issue, but the silence of anyone in a position to influence is deafening.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure I follow your point. Are you expecting someone of authority to come out and defend the movie's attributes?
 
Advertisement
AUcane said:
I'm not sure I follow your point. Are you expecting someone of authority to come out and defend the movie's attributes?
Click to expand...
No, but it would be nice for someone to say regardless of opinions about actors, the issue is serious. You mentioned Kutcher testifying before Congress. That was 6 years ago. What's happened since then? Has the problem gotten worse? If so, why and what can we do to stop it?

Instead the focus is on stupid **** that can be used to divide us into reliable voting blocs.
 
JD08 said:
No, but it would be nice for someone to say regardless of opinions about actors, the issue is serious. You mentioned Kutcher testifying before Congress. That was 6 years ago. What's happened since then? Has the problem gotten worse? If so, why and what can we do to stop it?

Instead the focus is on stupid **** that can be used to divide us into reliable voting blocs.
Click to expand...

Oh sure, totally agree. It doesn't seem to be a very popular topic, sadly, but it's very real across the globe including here but especially exUS.
 
Advertisement
AUcane said:
Yeah, like I said, Civiezal has fallen off the deep end. That should not take away from the content of the movie that he is acting in imo. I still consider him a fine actor.
Click to expand...
This is not an unheard of practice especially in parts of Africa where the practice of sorcery and witchcraft is still a thing.

It is arguably the powerful and elite liberal whack jobs looking for their fountain of youth that are the consumers in this country.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top