poncho0091
Senior
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 2,703
Please note that this isn't a "rebuild". This isn't 1-11 Stanford. This isn't a decimated roster. This isn't a program under NCAA investigation. This isn't a program with scholarship restrictions.
This is a team with a roster full of future NFL players that has been undercoached on gamedays and is stuck in a conservative, slow, scared team philosophy that doesn't maximize what they can do on the field.
This program doesn't need a guy to rebuild it and to fix a broken roster. It needs a great football coach who takes top talent and maximizes it on the field. Does Butch's past show that he maximizes talent with results on the field? Does his offense get the best out of the type of crazy speed we have down here? John Shoop?
Many of Folden's strengths are similar to Butch's strengths. Butch is better than Folden because Butch is a much better evaluator/developer than Folden. However, when it comes to maximizing talent on the field with results (read: wins not putting players in the NFL) they are pretty equal.
UM doesn't need a "rebuilder" which is really Butch's strength. UM needs a great HC who maximizes talent not minimizes it.
What evidence do you have that Butch is only a "rebuilder"? He's never been anywhere past the rebuilding stage, so please show me your evidence. It is nearly impossible to expect results until about year 3 when your first full recruiting class post sanctions going into their Jr year. Well in Butch's 3rd year after sanctions, year 6, we went 11-1. Taking over a 3 win team is a 3-4 year rebuild at best. Again, most here acknowledge Harbaugh is a great coach and it took him 4 years at Stanford and they had more history than UNC. Butch only finished 3 years before the sanctions hit.
Miami:
Year 1 is his first year with a new team - there were some studs on the team and the first 10 scholarships gone, but if you want to say he underperformed, fine. BTW, no bowl so only 8 wins.
Year 2 - 20 scholarships gone (estimating on the per year reduction), key players left, still got 9 wins, still won the bowl game, maintained ranked team status all year.
Year 3 - Full 1/3 of scholarships gone, most key players lost, 5 wins what do you expect.
Year 4 - First recruiting class without sanctions. Realistic people shouldn't expect much since we haven't been able to recruit players to replace the ones we lost, but our fanbase is full of idiots.
Year 5 - 2nd class, most of our rebuild players our now SO. and FR. expectations still should not be that high, but our fans our idiots. 9 wins and a bowl win.
Year 6 - 3rd class, key players are JR and SO. We go 11-1 and get robbed of a national title game and is gone the following year.
This progression looks pretty solid to me. The only year where there should have been any expectations are year 1 and 6. Year 1 underperformed and year 6 nearly won a title.
UNC was a full rebuild as a 3 win team. If you want to say he underperformed in year 3, then fine, but we never got to see true year 4 results.