Yes, I'm pretty hard headed that way. If UM wants to compete on the same level as the UGAs and Bamas, we need an AD who is a ball buster, knows how the game is played, and knows how to get deals done. I don't remember if you proposed Radokovich but he seemed quite qualified as well. I want a big time experienced AD, not someone who is moving up from an assistant AD job at Texas Tech.
I say that getting defamed, blamed for something without any proof being presented, and fired then having the accuser say "oops, nevermind" counts as being railroaded.
And you are forgetting there are 3 levels to the investigation. The school, the ncaa, and the FBI. All three layers cleared him. You can say he had dirt on Louisville so they settled, but the athletic department didn't get tagged in the ncaa notice of allegations. The ncaa specifically mentioned the Athletic department in their NOA to Arizona State , so if they thought the AD was involved, they would have said it. In the UL NOA, it was all about Pitinos failure to monitor and the basketball program. Given Jurich‘s extremely close ties to Adidas and Adidas being at the center of the bribery allegations, you really have to go into deep state conspiracy territory to think the ncaa would deliberately not mention him because they were specifically trying to protect him. Lastly the FBI investigation didn't turn up anything on Jurich. This was a multi level investigation with 3 different organizations looking into it and Jurich was not implicated by any of them. I don't know what else could possibly be said to make it more clear that in the eyes of the ncaa and the law, he wasn't involved.