Should Langham bulk up and add weight to play a hybrid Role?

Cityboy4life82

Thunderdome
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
777
Do you think he should bulk up and become an H-back/Tightend roll and be that tweener type of player?

I ask this because I would like to see him on the field a bit more. At wide out it may not be feasible but in a hybrid role there could be a possibility.
 

Cityboy4life82

Thunderdome
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
777
How have you not been banned yet?
I think he has shown he can play and produce. At wide out I am not sure how much he can get on the field do to his limited physical attributes (Speed)

Maybe as a tweener he can play a hybrid role and become more of then just a red zone threat which he has shown to be good at.
 

SFbayCane

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
12,605
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
 

5XNC

Senior
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
6,058
not a bad idea. he made a great catch in a clutch situation. does that mean he should be taking reps from the 6 guys in front of him? doubtful.
 

BALLHAWKU

All-ACC
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
7,906
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
After high pointing be ball and making the game winning TD that's at least what we should do . Langham wanted that ball more than the db I haven't seen that out of cager at all .
 

BALLHAWKU

All-ACC
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
7,906
not a bad idea. he made a great catch in a clutch situation. does that mean he should be taking reps from the 6 guys in front of him? doubtful.
Maybe all 6 of those guys shouldn't be in front of him . Cager Definitely not
 

TreOFive

Fug the Gates and Semenholes
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
6,397
The personnel experts, GM's and corches that we have in our fan base come out of the weeds at all times
 

Salt

"It's All About The Roo"
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
2,836
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
After high pointing be ball and making the game winning TD that's at least what we should do . Langham wanted that ball more than the db I haven't seen that out of cager at all .
to be honest that catch was not at the high point at all. That was beautiful back shoulder ball placement from Rosier. Langham still had to fight off the bumping he was getting from McFadden. Still... a hell of a catch.
 

theibisrules

Senior
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
5,747
So Al Golden has been resurrected?!? Fatten him up until he can barely move and then throw him back out there...sounds good let's do it!
 

rokulika

DIE HOMER SCUM
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
17,879
[MENTION=4908]theibisrules[/MENTION] who is that in your avatar?
 

Gamezgocanes

Recruit
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
103
No, he clean up his bad weight and put on some lean muscle. Max his potential at wideout.
 

orange&green84

All-ACC
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
13,549
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
After high pointing be ball and making the game winning TD that's at least what we should do . Langham wanted that ball more than the db I haven't seen that out of cager at all .
Cager not playing defense, or really going for the ball was the reason for Rosier's one pick.
 

DerekDohrman

Senior
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
2,722
not the worst idea. not sure id force him to add much more weight. but he could definitely play a herndon type role next year for his senior season.
 

jhtheking

Junior
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
2,271
not a bad idea. he made a great catch in a clutch situation. does that mean he should be taking reps from the 6 guys in front of him? doubtful.
Huh? Yes. If you have a player that gets in the zone and can make great catches in the most clutch situation of the game you get him the ball more.
 

SFbayCane

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
12,605
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
After high pointing be ball and making the game winning TD that's at least what we should do . Langham wanted that ball more than the db I haven't seen that out of cager at all .
Cager not playing defense, or really going for the ball was the reason for Rosier's one pick.
( Also responding to [MENTION=6214]Cash[/MENTION] )




I don't think Cager played soft or bad, I simply think he lacks the athleticism to make adjustments while running in order to make a difficult catch. He only production seems to come from slant patterns where he gets inside position on a smaller DB. If the ball doesn't hit him in stride and within the numbers, the catch isn't made.

On the interception, he must not have tracked the ball at all. When you watch that play on the Sky Cam, its clear that Cager does not amend his route at all. He doesn't seem to pick up the flight of the ball until its nearly on top of him. Maybe he has a vision problem (serious comment).
 

Cash

Emperor
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
3,945
Im in favor of giving Cager's reps to Langham for the next couple weeks to see how he does.
After high pointing be ball and making the game winning TD that's at least what we should do . Langham wanted that ball more than the db I haven't seen that out of cager at all .
Cager not playing defense, or really going for the ball was the reason for Rosier's one pick.
( Also responding to [MENTION=6214]Cash[/MENTION] )




I don't think Cager played soft or bad, I simply think he lacks the athleticism to make adjustments while running in order to make a difficult catch. He only production seems to come from slant patterns where he gets inside position on a smaller DB. If the ball doesn't hit him in stride and within the numbers, the catch isn't made.

On the interception, he must not have tracked the ball at all. When you watch that play on the Sky Cam, its clear that Cager does not amend his route at all. He doesn't seem to pick up the flight of the ball until its nearly on top of him. Maybe he has a vision problem (serious comment).
I don’t blame him at all for interception. Totally out of his reach. I watched him pull up on 3 separate passes because he didn’t want to take a hit which is why I made that statement. Probably should’ve clarified. 2 passes in final drive they tried to hit him down the sideline also looked like he tried to catch the PI call rather than fight for the ball. By that one he should’ve known he wasn’t going to get a PI call from those douche bag refs.
 
Top