forums

Shemar Stewart

Advertisement
Tony4Canes said:
Click to expand...

1753117180769.jpeg
 
#Bengals owner Mike Brown explained that the holdup in getting Shemar Stewart signed isn't about money, but rather about contract guarantees in extreme disciplinary scenarios. Stewart’s agent is pushing for the deal to remain fully guaranteed even if Stewart were to commit a serious violation — something (hypothetically) as severe as going to prison. Brown noted that while he doesn’t believe that will ever happen, it’s the sticking point that’s delaying the deal.

I want you to pay me if I receive a DUI, slap a bebe momma, and rob a bank.
 
oso4lyf said:
#Bengals owner Mike Brown explained that the holdup in getting Shemar Stewart signed isn't about money, but rather about contract guarantees in extreme disciplinary scenarios. Stewart’s agent is pushing for the deal to remain fully guaranteed even if Stewart were to commit a serious violation — something (hypothetically) as severe as going to prison. Brown noted that while he doesn’t believe that will ever happen, it’s the sticking point that’s delaying the deal.

I want you to pay me if I receive a DUI, slap a bebe momma, and rob a bank.
Click to expand...
If Bengals are to be believed, then this is a crazy reach. Team is suggesting he wants guarantee of being paid even if he’s unable to play due to legal issues. Probably wondering why the **** they drafted the guy.
 
Advertisement
RozayCane said:
Click to expand...

**** this guy. Showing his *** for the umpteenth time. No wonder the Bengals are perpetual bottom feeders. Also, **** Shemar, and Short Fat Moe.

However, from what I understand this is new contract language, so Shemar's agent is rightfully telling him it's a potentially raw deal.

"Conduct detrimental to football" WTF does that even mean? That's so vague that it could be applied to just about anything.
 
hoops156 said:
I think they were trying not to fully guarantee it. he got it fully guaranteed so it sounds like he won
Click to expand...
It was always fully guaranteed. The holdout was due to them putting a clause(s) that they could void the guarantees for “Conduct detrimental to football" among other things that are not in other 1st round draft picks contracts.
 
Advertisement
DC3 said:
Hendrickson just left camp because the Bengals were lowballing him in the GTD money for his much needed extension.
Click to expand...
Two situations have nothing to do with each other though. Anybody being honest can say yes the Bengals are tight with the wallet. Anybody being honest with the situation can also say in this instance it's not on the Bengals...
 
JamesQuall said:
It was always fully guaranteed. The holdout was due to them putting a clause(s) that they could void the guarantees for “Conduct detrimental to football" among other things that are not in other 1st round draft picks contracts.
Click to expand...
There is always fine print in a contract. If it's to believe what they're asking for is contract detrimental to football, then that is in every contract. If you recall it happened to Carl Malone in basketball all these years ago when he got hurt riding his Harley-Davidson they voided a contract for him. So it is always in a contract it's just simply how exactly they've chosen to word it
 
Brooklyndee said:
There is always fine print in a contract. If it's to believe what they're asking for is contract detrimental to football, then that is in every contract. If you recall it happened to Carl Malone in basketball all these years ago when he got hurt riding his Harley-Davidson they voided a contract for him. So it is always in a contract it's just simply how exactly they've chosen to word it
Click to expand...
Karl not carl
 
Back
Top