You are confused bc u are a moron.
No team with this many elite prospects should EVER BE LAST IN THE COASTAL DIVISION AND UNDER 500.
God we have some real **** smoking fans.
Ahhh the ol' internet tuff guy. Again there are two arguments here. Canes have had a lot of talent but went 6-7. Correct, of course. Thats inexcusable. Im talking about the comparisons to Chick being miss-used and suggesting the same for Dorsett and Perryman. Both were well utilized based on their skill set. Does that make any sense to you?
Dorsett should have been a 1000 yard wr. Perryman would have looked even better in a better scheme. You 6-7 with a bunch of talent then it's obvious the talent is being misused somehow.
Al golden showed up at his intervention with an anerrexic male personal trainer with fake ****. He sold 3 used cars that day. Him and his buddy went to New Jersey.
I gotta agree with sevenben. If you wanna use the "misuse players" argument then you can't put Dorsett and Perryman in with chik because those two are the few players that were used to their abilities. Now if you wanna say how can a team lose 7 games than you can put Perryman and Dorsett in with Chik.
You guys are out to lunch. And LULZ at agreeing with an fsu troll.
Perryman excelled somewhat at UM because he is an incredible talent. He's a top 10 in the draft type of football talent. You could see how special and explosive he was the minute he stepped on the field as a true freshmans. And he never really looked any better than he did as a freshmans.
He played in the same **** scheme and philosophy as the rest of the guys, so to claim that they used him well and taught him well while not coaching anyone else up is retarded.
Think of Perryman as the genius 150 IQ kid at a really bad public school. The bad school didn't make him a genius. In fact, if he stayed there for any length of time, his genius was likely undeveloped and squandered.