- Joined
- Mar 23, 2017
- Messages
- 4,056
As long as we keep them 150 yards between the 20s.As I was reading your post, I was thinking exactly what you said at the end, but 150 on 23 carries is still getting torched that’s over 6 yards per carry
As long as we keep them 150 yards between the 20s.As I was reading your post, I was thinking exactly what you said at the end, but 150 on 23 carries is still getting torched that’s over 6 yards per carry
No he will not.
In Hetherman’s first season as the DC at Minnesota he had the #9 rushing defense in the Nation with a bunch of no name 3 stars. He basically had a defensive line full of Daylen Russell’s and they balled every week. The combination of Hetherman scheme and the talent on this team is going to be insane.
Penn State returns the #1 backfield and had the 17th ranked rushing attack in 2024. Notre Dame returns the #2 backfield and had the 19th ranked rushing attack in 2024.
Hetherman faced Penn State in 2024 and held them to 117 yards on 33 attempts for an average of 3.5 per carry. For the season Penn State averaged 202 yards rushing per game and 5.3 yards per carry
Unfortunately, game is a contact sport and injuries often crop up. Quality depth is critical. The notion of sliding DEs inside if we have to other than obvious passing situations, isn’t a solution. OCs aren’t stupid and will find ways to expose.Exactly. If our top 5 guys stay relatively healthy, we should be solid. But how likely is that? Injuries happen.
You know you lose all credibility when you say our tackles look like they’re in the 280 to 300 range. That’s complete BS and if you don’t know that, there’s a problem with your evaluations on anything. All three of them are well over 300 pounds and that is a fact. So before you put a statement on here, get your facts straight on their weights, they’re all over 300 pounds, not 280. All that does is push an agenda that isn’t true. SMHProblem Statement: From a traditional defense perspective, we are too thin at Safety and DT. Our expected classic Safety rotation at this point includes Poyser and Thomas as starters, and "possibly" Williams and Day as first in. At DT, we have Blay, Moten and Scott (looking in the 280-300 range) with Jones as the expected rotational player After that, you have true freshmen who may contribute at some point. Classically, that looks too thin to be a playoff contender much less winner. Along with place kicker, those two spots are my biggest concern going into summer/fall camp.
Emerging Solution: @Peter Ariz and @DMoney confirmed in their podcasts today and over the past week that the staff is settling on Lucas and Blount as the two players you move if you need help out at DT and Safety. Meanwhile, @Lance Roffers and @Hstokes1447 are firm believers Hetherman's 4i base scheme, and primary passing down schemes favors leaner, faster guys like these two (along with guys like Bobby Pruitt at LB, Lightfoot at Jack, etc.).
Expected Outcome: ?
The Wilforks and Sapps being the exception (and Sapp was "only" 300 at Miami, and both had generational burst), SPEED was a Miami brand during the championship decades. Ironically, it's Big 10 Hetherman who seems to be bringing us back to a speed-first philosophy. When we were great, we could hold the line against the Nebraskas and Oklahomas and Notre Dames, if needed, with only 4 guys. Do we have the dudes to do so in 2025? Can we stop the run with Hetherman's 4i and fast packages? Can we make it through 13+ games into the playoffs with this roster?
Unfortunately, game is a contact sport and injuries often crop up. Quality depth is critical. The notion of sliding DEs inside if we have to other than obvious passing situations, isn’t a solution. OCs aren’t stupid and will find ways to expose.
You are giving OCs too much creditUnfortunately, game is a contact sport and injuries often crop up. Quality depth is critical. The notion of sliding DEs inside if we have to other than obvious passing situations, isn’t a solution. OCs aren’t stupid and will find ways to expose.
Williams looks 190 finally lol
In a "positionless" philosophy shouldnt we be trying to piece together what skill sets he tried to balance on the field rather than looking at total mass?Minnesota starting d-line last year was 285, 290, 310, 254. Miami will be 265, 305, 305, 265. So what’s the big difference?
More depth on the way at safety.
Miami adds veteran safety transfer for the 2025 season
https://247sports.com/player/briton-allen-46041819/college-235812/
Until this particular D plays a few games we won’t know.I also have little faith in our ability to take proper angles × tackle x hit. Until this D can be labeled truly tough and physical we will be vulnerable to less talented teams scoring on this D consistently.
You know you lose all credibility when you say our tackles look like they’re in the 280 to 300 range. That’s complete BS and if you don’t know that, there’s a problem with your evaluations on anything. All three of them are well over 300 pounds and that is a fact. So before you put a statement on here, get your facts straight on their weights, they’re all over 300 pounds, not 280. All that does is push an agenda that isn’t true. SMH
Yeah I see us stacking the box and making the new qb beat us. Get up early and this thing may not be close.
Yep, huge red flagGoes back to the repeated recruiting failures at key positions. In year 4 with a recruiting minded HC we shouldn’t be having to think about converting ends to tackle and corners to safety.
I mean it sound good but there isn’t no such thing as a positionless defense in football. Maybe you do some of that type stuff with the back 7In a "positionless" philosophy shouldnt we be trying to piece together what skill sets he tried to balance on the field rather than looking at total mass?