hoops156
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 26,423
The issue is play for pay. That has ALWAYS been a major violation of NCAA regulations. What the NCAA is alluding to I believe is simply APPLYING that prohibited activity (paying a player to commit to a program) to the NIL contracts. NIL agreements ARE SUPPOSED TO BE for players that are committed to a program. NIL deals are NOT supposed to be THE ENTICEMENT FOR a player to SIGN with a program. The NCAA is saying that if the NIL agreement was put into a players hands PRIOR to the player committing to a program, that it can / will be interpreted as and inducement to sign and the programs involved will be sanctioned. The burden of proof is on them regarding contact timelines.
this. this is why the Wong issue made him a bit untouchable if he got an NIL deal anywhere else.