This.
Neither Perry nor Weldon nor Williams showed anything that proved they were head over heels better than Rosier. And don't get me wrong, I've been ****ED with Malik's play over the last 4 games like a motherfer!!! But I also recognize the simple FACT that our coaches work with these kids every day; we read blips and random feedback here and there and post on a forum.
Of course, the anti-Richt gang spearheaded by Canes Dynasty and his little circle jerk "institution" crew will push a totally different narrative about how great the young QBs were and how Richt and his staff don't give a **** about winning and just want to play vets over talent, but none of that s-hit holds water.
Clearly based on the fact Perry came in early and not just in garbage time, CMR accepts that Malik has to win his spot too. But Perry was so-so, did a few ok things, also got bailed out by some great catches and threw an INT that all the anti-Rosier crowd would have been yelling incessantly about had it been thrown by Rosier (fact). The reality is, none of them looked exceptional; not Malik, not Perry, not Weldon, not Williams.
So, maybe it's not as simple as the anti-Richt blowhards think it is, huh?[/QUOTE
I agree that Richt isn't conspiring to keep Rosier as starter. If any of the three freshmen were clearly better than Rosier, they'd be starting. But this means Richt and staff have failed at talent evaluation and/or development because you don't need to be all that good to be better than Rosier.