forums

Rosier post game comments

Doppelganger said:
iLoveTDs said:
What Rosier did with his legs last night was the difference in the game.

In 2016 VT sacked us 8 times. Kayaa had 9 carries for -55 yards (sacks). 43 QBR.

In 2017 VT sacked us 2 times. Rosier had 13 carries for 85 yards and 1 TD. 77 QBR.
Click to expand...

He also had a 7-0 team (Kaaya's was 4-2), a Saturday night home game (Kaaya had a Thursday night road game) and just a better supporting cast all around.

His running is important but so is pretty much everything else.
Click to expand...

Mindless fanboy response. Silly and lazy analysis. It's insightful post's like this which show how ignorant our fan base is.
 
Advertisement
Doppelganger said:
fraggle said:
Winning solves many problems
Click to expand...

If were 5-3 (or even 6-2) Rosier would be right there with Kaaya. Hated beyond all reason.

Most of the fans are complete frauds.

They'd toss Rosier overboard in a split second.
Click to expand...

That's the fcking point. Largely because of Rosier's ability to remove his head from his *** when it matters, we're undefeated. If we were 5-3 it would be for several reasons, one of which would be that Rosier has sucked for the first half in most of our games.
 
kryptonite said:
That's the fcking point. Largely because of Rosier's ability to remove his head from his *** when it matters, we're undefeated. If we were 5-3 it would be for several reasons, one of which would be that Rosier has sucked for the first half in most of our games.
Click to expand...

No, the whole point is that's silly.

Langham catching a tipped ball wasn't Rosier's "winning" mentality coming through. It was just a lucky break.

And it proves how fake the average fan is because they'd hate Rosier if the luck broke the other way or if the defense was a slightly worse.
 
kryptonite said:
If we were 5-3 it would be for several reasons, one of which would be that Rosier has sucked for the first half in most of our games.
Click to expand...

This is still true!

He has sucked in the first half and we're 8-0.

If we were 5-3, he still would've sucked in those first halves.

It's the same regardless.
 
Doppelganger said:
kryptonite said:
That's the fcking point. Largely because of Rosier's ability to remove his head from his *** when it matters, we're undefeated. If we were 5-3 it would be for several reasons, one of which would be that Rosier has sucked for the first half in most of our games.
Click to expand...

No, the whole point is that's silly.

Langham catching a tipped ball wasn't Rosier's "winning" mentality coming through. It was just a lucky break.

And it proves how fake the average fan is because they'd hate Rosier if the luck broke the other way or if the defense was a slightly worse.
Click to expand...

Who are you even arguing with right now? Nobody thinks Rosier is some crazy talented QB, but many of us think he's got a winner's mentality. When the pressure is the greatest, some guys are able to focus and play their best. He's one of them. Doesn't mean he'll always win or he'll never be the reason we lost, but so far, when it matters, he makes the play. And don't go on about Langham, a pass needs at least 2 guys to work so Langham's heroics don't take away from Rosier...Langham can't throw to himself. Rosier remained upright and threw the ball to spots where guys could make a play and they did.
 
kryptonite said:
Who are you even arguing with right now? Nobody thinks Rosier is some crazy talented QB, but many of us think he's got a winner's mentality.
Click to expand...

Did you not just read what I posted?

This is what I'm disputing.

The idea that Rosier has some magic that makes him "winner" guy.

He has a very good team and his flaws haven't been enough (although it's been close) to lose a game yet.

That's it.
 
Advertisement
Doppelganger said:
kryptonite said:
If we were 5-3 it would be for several reasons, one of which would be that Rosier has sucked for the first half in most of our games.
Click to expand...

This is still true!

He has sucked in the first half and we're 8-0.

If we were 5-3, he still would've sucked in those first halves.

It's the same regardless.
Click to expand...

The point is that most of us care more about winning than not sucking sometimes. Do I love that he takes 1/2 the game to get warmed up? I do not. But as long as he keeps playing well enough for enough of the game that we win, I really don't care.
 
I’m about wins and losses. Would I like pretty wins of course but at the end of the day it’s about the W. As a Miami fan u should know that after seeing us lose in a National championship game to the ugliest team I’ve ever seen in *. Guess what, no matter how ugly they were the history books still shows they were the champs.
 
kryptonite said:
And don't go on about Langham, a pass needs at least 2 guys to work so Langham's heroics don't take away from Rosier...Langham can't throw to himself. Rosier remained upright and threw the ball to spots where guys could make a play and they did.
Click to expand...

Comical.

He threw the ball up into double coverage, had it tipped and his receiver made a great play.

Next thing you're going to do is credit Rosier for the kick return in 2015.
 
Doppelganger said:
kryptonite said:
Who are you even arguing with right now? Nobody thinks Rosier is some crazy talented QB, but many of us think he's got a winner's mentality.
Click to expand...

Did you not just read what I posted?

This is what I'm disputing.

The idea that Rosier has some magic that makes him "winner" guy.

He has a very good team and his flaws haven't been enough (although it's been close) to lose a game yet.

That's it.
Click to expand...

He makes plays at the end of games. Therefore he is "winner guy".

Kayaa made plays for more of the game and rarely looked as bad a Rosier, but he didn't make plays at the end of games therefore he is not "winner guy".
 
Doppelganger said:
kryptonite said:
And don't go on about Langham, a pass needs at least 2 guys to work so Langham's heroics don't take away from Rosier...Langham can't throw to himself. Rosier remained upright and threw the ball to spots where guys could make a play and they did.
Click to expand...

Comical.

He threw the ball up into double coverage, had it tipped and his receiver made a great play.

Next thing you're going to do is credit Rosier for the kick return in 2015.
Click to expand...

Would Kayaa have made that throw or would he have been on his back?
 
KingCane20 said:
As a Miami fan u should know that after seeing us lose in a National championship game to the ugliest team I’ve ever seen in *. Guess what, no matter how ugly they were the history books still shows they were the champs.
Click to expand...

But the main reason why they won so "ugly" was because their quarterback sucked.
 
Advertisement
Jeezus, another thread derailed by Rosier bickering. We get it...he's inconsistent as heck. We're 8-0. We might very well lose a game because of Rosier. Why are we still arguing over this? Let's enjoy the ride.
 
kryptonite said:
He makes plays at the end of games. Therefore he is "winner guy".
Click to expand...

But he doesn't.

What play did he make against GT? Syracuse?

Again, if he was better he wouldn't be in those positions.

How many "plays at the end of games" did Ken Dorsey make?
 
Back
Top