- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 22,077
I just don’t like the approach of tearing down our good players simply because they aren’t our great players. Shaq Quarterman fell victim to the same narrative.We aren't competing nor should be comparing with the other 98% of college athletes and 75% of four star players. We're competing with the 2% and the 25% (which also tracks as we've topped out as a Top 5 team at some points during the past 20 years only to **** it away and usually end up as a Top 25% team with our 8-5 type record over that time) Darryl Sharpton could have played on a lot of teams. Could have played on a lot of 2-10 or 5-7 or 7-6 or 9-4 teams, too, over his career.
He's not at standard here. Comparing him to third linebackers on stacked teams is the mental jui jitsu you've made over the years. idk, I see a pretty distinct drop in quality from Beason (and from Vilma to Beason) to Sharpton and the linebackers that come after him, ranging from higher rated prospect but failed by a coaching staff like Sean Spence or lower rated recruits that also become Sharpton level players like Denzel and Shaq. They are all NFL players to some extent, but the decline in standard is obvious on the macro.
There is no question we dropped off with elite, first round players. It’s our biggest issue and these reviews make it obvious. But the early Coker classes in particular struggled because they didn’t layer enough good players like Sharpton and Shaq under the handful of Pro Bowlers.