Zubair ILyas
Redshirt Freshman
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 125
Yearby's cut on the Duke defender was nasty!
Yearby's cut on the Duke defender was nasty!
I see it more as viewing the game in context rather than hyping GT. WE aren't very good and we are on the road. That's what makes GT dangerous, IMO.Good write up as always but if people think that we playing the same gtech QB as last year they in for a rude awakening.
.... and so begins the GT hype up efforts of the week. At least nobody can slurp their head corch with a straight face.
I see it more as viewing the game in context rather than hyping GT. WE aren't very good and we are on the road. That's what makes GT dangerous, IMO.Good write up as always but if people think that we playing the same gtech QB as last year they in for a rude awakening.
.... and so begins the GT hype up efforts of the week. At least nobody can slurp their head corch with a straight face.
I don't think their personnel matters all that much. We know what they are going to do, and it always looks the same. I saw J. Thomas against Tulane and he was one of the worst passers I have ever seen. Not that that precludes him from looking like Davey O'Brien against us.
Saying a team sucks, after you beat them, doesn't actually help the case you're trying to make. You do understand that right? Intellectually lazy...
Saying a team sucks, after you beat them, doesn't actually help the case you're trying to make. You do understand that right? Intellectually lazy...
Thank you. First off, Duke does not suck. They are a solid team that will probably win 8 to 9 games in the regular season. I doubt we'll get to that same #. If we don't recognize that the days of Duke being a walkover game are long gone then our base is clueless. I hate that school and glad we beat them, but they kicked our *** last year and we had a lot of trouble with them in 2012.
I'm not sure why a solid article like this has to have an unprofessional headline like that.
I'm not sure why a solid article like this has to have an unprofessional headline like that.
I'm going to do it every week now, regardless of how the game goes.I'm not sure why a solid article like this has to have an unprofessional headline like that.
Saying a team sucks, after you beat them, doesn't actually help the case you're trying to make. You do understand that right? Intellectually lazy...
Thank you. First off, Duke does not suck. They are a solid team that will probably win 8 to 9 games in the regular season. I doubt we'll get to that same #. If we don't recognize that the days of Duke being a walkover game are long gone then our base is clueless. I hate that school and glad we beat them, but they kicked our *** last year and we had a lot of trouble with them in 2012.
I'm not sure why a solid article like this has to have an unprofessional headline like that.
Saying a team sucks, after you beat them, doesn't actually help the case you're trying to make. You do understand that right? Intellectually lazy...
Thank you. First off, Duke does not suck. They are a solid team that will probably win 8 to 9 games in the regular season. I doubt we'll get to that same #. If we don't recognize that the days of Duke being a walkover game are long gone then our base is clueless. I hate that school and glad we beat them, but they kicked our *** last year and we had a lot of trouble with them in 2012.
I'm not sure why a solid article like this has to have an unprofessional headline like that.
This is the original pic by Charles Trainor at the HeraldSick picture with the team coming out in the smoke. Is there a high-res picture available?