forums

2027 QB Israel Abrams

P-Tizzle said:
htownkidd said:
Is he? So has FSU, AU and with Kentucky 2 of their last 3 being portal guys and their 2026 starter is a young portal guy. I don’t even care to check Purdue. Oregon has 3 straight as well. Why are we the only one’s talked about though?
Click to expand...
The argument isn’t where he will sign. The argument is “better situation”. Miami hasn’t started a QB they recruited under Mario since Emory and that was by necessity. We’ve started 24, 25, and now 26 seasons with a portal QB. Abrams has a better situation (for him to play) at UK than at Miami.
Click to expand...
Dude's really trying to say Kentucky is a better spot than Miami. 🤣
 
Advertisement
timmay9699 said:
Dude's really trying to say Kentucky is a better spot than Miami. 🤣
Click to expand...
Yeah if he wants to play. You’re telling me that Kentucky wouldn’t be a better spot for Judd or Nickel? Judd won’t throw a pass for us and it’s looking that way for Nickel too. Emory already transferred. If you haven’t noticed, Mario has recruited three straight portal QBs to start for him: Cam (one and done; top pick in draft), Beck (one and done; projected 3-4 round; NC game), and now Mensah (projected to be one and done). There’s a trend here.
 
P-Tizzle said:
The argument isn’t where he will sign. The argument is “better situation”. Miami hasn’t started a QB they recruited under Mario since Emory and that was by necessity. We’ve started 24, 25, and now 26 seasons with a portal QB. Abrams has a better situation (for him to play) at UK than at Miami.
Click to expand...
That's faulty logic. The last three years, we've basically had to recruit a portal QB as what we had on hand wasn't high-level. Emory and Judd were in no one's top rankings -- we all knew it was very unlikely they'd be productive here. Nickel and Coleman, while more highly regarded than those two, still weren't sniffing any top 100 lists.

Abrams would be the first legit blue-chip QB that we've recruited out of H.S. since Mario's been here. If he lives up to his ranking, good chance we won't need to get a portal guy.

You seem unable to differentiate situations.
 
Combo said:
That's faulty logic. To this point, we've basically had to recruit a portal QB as what we had on hand wasn't high-level. Emory and Judd were in no one's top rankings -- we all knew it was very unlikely they'd be productive here. Nickel and Coleman, while more highly regarded than those two, still weren't sniffing any top 100 lists.

Abrams would be the first legit blue-chip QB that we've recruited out of H.S. since Mario's been here. If he lives up to his ranking, good chance we won't need to get a portal guy.
Click to expand...
So Abrams starts here in 27 as a true freshman?
 
skyman said:
Its like we have portal guys and people just make up reasons why it will hurt us.. They said high school QBs would hate it but listen to Abrams interview and its a DRAW for him, Mencl the same (these are the TOP level of QBs in nation, not projects anymore, THANK YOU PORTAL!).. Now guys are saying it will hurt crootin bro, hurt skill guys bro..

Portal QBs is the gift that keeps on giving, everything happening positive to the football team starts with portal QB these last two seasons.. Its like gusy would rather be 7-5 if we could do it with high school QBs than be in playoff race.. Weird AF.. Last year championship with ND-OSU was two portal QBs.. This year same.. Portal QB won heisman and back 2 back #1 overall NFL pick

Click to expand...

And the minute we go 9-3 and miss the playoffs because the freshman 5 star qb struggles cue the fans *****ing about how we should’ve gone after that highly rated transfer qb
 
Back
Top