Puke Campbell at it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes that has partly to do with it. Not all of it. The other part is the absence of fathers mentoring kids to do better. Then the voting record in those communities is the definition of insanity.
The voting record in every disenfranchised and impoverished community is low, it’s a by product of disillusionment.

The fathers were removed by government assistance programs that demanded that no male be a resident of a black woman’s home or she is ineligible for food stamps and welfare. My mother, aunts, uncles, and grandparents still remember the request and some still have the literature/pamphlets that were handed out during the late 60’s thru the 70’s. No other community remembers or was subjected to such a request or prerequisite. Also during the *** Revolution of the 70’s black women were targeted by feminist movements to get their numbers and influence up while encouraging black women to leave their unemployed “useless” men as government and civil service jobs targeted black women specifically for employment (make black women the bread winners.)

The relationship between the black father and mother was attacked for 400 years during American slavery as well. Black men were breeders and thus encouraged and accustomed to fathering children that they had no responsibility to care for, not to mention the pain of losing them to sale or auction after you have actually bonded with your children. These occurrences justifiably discouraged doing so. Marriage was also against the law for black people for 400 years. Imagine that.

Then you have the 80’s “War on Drugs” that federally funded the over policing and racial profiling of black communities leading to phenomena like the Prison Industrial Complex, the Iran Contra Affair (the story of the real Freeway Ricky Ross), and incidents like Mena, Arkansas where planes were caught being flown in to transport cocaine into black neighborhoods. The “War on Drugs” was the single most damaging legislation designed to remove black men from their households and put them in prisons. Super Predators, Mandatory Minimums, and Three Strike Laws, Stop and Frisk, and Stand Your Ground laws etc all War on Black Father’s and his place in the black family.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Well ****, the johnny come lately's started off the country as its setup now as "interventionist" but not to the degree it has been over the last 50yrs. You can say its slavery 2.0 all you want, that just shows your lackmof comparison skills. The Cubans are citizens of their country, the slaves in this country have never been citizens or look at as countrymen. The revolution in Cuba is an ongoing thing, with enemies of Cuba everything has a nd must be watched. And while the occupiers in Israel have been t h ere for longer than they ever should have, before they got their, they were already designing world policies before they got there, so let's not try and play that game, who do you think loaned hitler money!

Like I said, you have your agenda. However misguided said agenda may be, again, this is America. So you can keep on spouting your garbled nonsense and I'll just sit here and laugh - as is commensurate with our rights, as Americans.

The analysis was rather elementary, simply because you disagree with the conclusion does not demonstrate a "lackmof comparison skills." Soviet/Cuban Dissidents were/are forced to work, unable to travel, constantly monitored by the state, and routinely murdered. Seems like an apt comparison (though not a carbon copy, hence 2.0)

“[T]he slaves in this country have never been citizens or look at as countrymen." What does that even mean? It's, at best, a captious, overly-broad, poorly written non sequitur that only furthers my point re: your agenda.

Again, just say what you mean - why hide behind such a thin veil? You're getting closer (occupier, loaning money to hitler) so just jump all the way in already. I’m guessing you have some interesting opinions on who the true Israelites are.
 
Luke is that old grandfather who says outlandish things. Similar to how Quincy Jones said some crazy stuff in is Vulture interview. Uncle Luke does have a point whether you want to accept it or not though. Miami has to get some coaches that can relate to these players on a cultural level.
 
Y'all keep doggin Luke yet we STILL SUCK! Practically everything the man says eventually comes to pass, which is why we're on our 3rd coach in 3 years! WHEN WILL YOU BLOG **** LEARN?
 
Like I said, you have your agenda. However misguided said agenda may be, again, this is America. So you can keep on spouting your garbled nonsense and I'll just sit here and laugh - as is commensurate with our rights, as Americans.

The analysis was rather elementary, simply because you disagree with the conclusion does not demonstrate a "lackmof comparison skills." Soviet/Cuban Dissidents were/are forced to work, unable to travel, constantly monitored by the state, and routinely murdered. Seems like an apt comparison (though not a carbon copy, hence 2.0)

“[T]he slaves in this country have never been citizens or look at as countrymen." What does that even mean? It's, at best, a captious, overly-broad, poorly written non sequitur that only furthers my point re: your agenda.

Again, just say what you mean - why hide behind such a thin veil? You're getting closer (occupier, loaning money to hitler) so just jump all the way in already. I’m guessing you have some interesting opinions on who the true Israelites are.

The only agenda is Truth over falsehoods and emotions. You have alot to catch up on and your disdain clouds your brain to the facts. You want to talk about the True Israelites, all you have to do us ask yourself this question, what Jews do you know claim that they were ever held in bondage, or taking to another land unknown to them. Had their names changed, their religion changed, their God changed, dont know their original language or what language they ever spoke. Had their whole diet changed, cut off from anything they ever knew. If you can answer those questions than you'll get closer to the Truth. You have to also ask yourself, what is the correlation to what happened to those who call themselves Jews in germany have to do with the people in Palestine. If what happened to those who call themselves Jews happened in germany, why than was their not negoitations with germany to carve out land for them.

I dont understand how a people who the history books say hitler tortured can now go to another continent and began to torture the Palestinian people, why not do what they doing to the Palestinians, do that somewhere in germany and i think than the world would understand, but they've decided to create their own enemies for some odd reason. You are the type, that your motives for using "big words" shows that you are not a just human being. Justice is the Law of Nature, you cant win!
 
The only agenda is Truth over falsehoods and emotions. You have alot to catch up on and your disdain clouds your brain to the facts. You want to talk about the True Israelites, all you have to do us ask yourself this question, what Jews do you know claim that they were ever held in bondage, or taking to another land unknown to them. Had their names changed, their religion changed, their God changed, dont know their original language or what language they ever spoke. Had their whole diet changed, cut off from anything they ever knew. If you can answer those questions than you'll get closer to the Truth. You have to also ask yourself, what is the correlation to what happened to those who call themselves Jews in germany have to do with the people in Palestine. If what happened to those who call themselves Jews happened in germany, why than was their not negoitations with germany to carve out land for them.

I dont understand how a people who the history books say hitler tortured can now go to another continent and began to torture the Palestinian people, why not do what they doing to the Palestinians, do that somewhere in germany and i think than the world would understand, but they've decided to create their own enemies for some odd reason. You are the type, that your motives for using "big words" shows that you are not a just human being. Justice is the Law of Nature, you cant win!

You’ve actually piqued my interest. No real point in debating who correctly interprets a 3,000 year old moral code based on fairytales, run of the mill holocaust denial or the geopolitical basis for the founding of Israel - with you (especially here). Pretty sure neither one of us is going to change the others mind (we both think the other is thoroughly “brainwashed,” so there likely won’t be much middle ground). I just wanted to confirm, to myself, that I could reel you in with a tiny piece of bait (mission accomplished).

That said, I am curious how you’ve come to the conclusion that people who use “big words” are not just humans. Or is it just me, and my motives (whatever those may be), specifically? Also, what game are we playing that I can’t win? Those, at least, are novel arguments.
 
You’ve actually piqued my interest. No real point in debating who correctly interprets a 3,000 year old moral code based on fairytales, run of the mill holocaust denial or the geopolitical basis for the founding of Israel - with you (especially here). Pretty sure neither one of us is going to change the others mind (we both think the other is thoroughly “brainwashed,” so there likely won’t be much middle ground). I just wanted to confirm, to myself, that I could reel you in with a tiny piece of bait (mission accomplished).

That said, I am curious how you’ve come to the conclusion that people who use “big words” are not just humans. Or is it just me, and my motives (whatever those may be), specifically? Also, what game are we playing that I can’t win? Those, at least, are novel arguments.

If you think you baited me, have at it, the Truth is the Truth. Not trying to convince you of anything, i just stated the facts about Fidel, who was an Atheist, but as he stated something to the affect of, "one does not have to believe in religion to have high moral principles". EL Commadante did what alot of religious hypocrites fail or claim they want to do, He fed the hungry, housed the homeless, clothe the naked, and provided for the sick! These are the facts, now under what type of government is your issue but the question i have for you, was Cuba a better, stronger and more properous nation before Castro took over, and what type of government was in place before Fidel, did they have the better interest of and for Cuba at heart!
 
Advertisement
EL Commadante did what alot of religious hypocrites fail or claim they want to do, He fed the hungry, housed the homeless, clothe the naked, and provided for the sick! These are the facts, now under what type of government is your issue but the question i have for you, was Cuba a better, stronger and more properous nation before Castro took over, and what type of government was in place before Fidel, did they have the better interest of and for Cuba at heart!

I addressed the healthcare myth earlier, so I won't discuss that on here. Castro did not feed the hungry. The pots and pans that Cubans beat here in the streets in celebration originated in the late 60's and early 70's as food became scarce. Women took to the streets to bang on empty pots with wooden spoons to protest the fact that their husbands were going to work but there was no food to bring back home. The Castros took food out of the mouths of Cubans to sell it in tourist stores and told the citizens, there was no food because of the embargo, but urged them to ask their relatives in Florida to send them money so they could go buy it in those same tourist stores. Castro never had anyone's best interest at heart. He was a sociopath who wanted power, but couldn't even win an election to be class president, so he took power by force.
 
I addressed the healthcare myth earlier, so I won't discuss that on here. Castro did not feed the hungry. The pots and pans that Cubans beat here in the streets in celebration originated in the late 60's and early 70's as food became scarce. Women took to the streets to bang on empty pots with wooden spoons to protest the fact that their husbands were going to work but there was no food to bring back home. The Castros took food out of the mouths of Cubans to sell it in tourist stores and told the citizens, there was no food because of the embargo, but urged them to ask their relatives in Florida to send them money so they could go buy it in those same tourist stores. Castro never had anyone's best interest at heart. He was a sociopath who wanted power, but couldn't even win an election to be class president, so he took power by force.
 

How much of that do you attribute to the sanctions, and after the 60's and 70's was food more available to the public! And up to present time, how is the food situation!
 
How much of that do you attribute to the sanctions, and after the 60's and 70's was food more available to the public! And up to present time, how is the food situation!

Not a whole lot. Every other country in the world does business with Cuba. It makes no sense to think that because we don't conduct trade with Cuba, that the sanctions are starving the country. The sanctions for the most part didn't work. Most western european countries, Canada, Mexico have all invested millions into Cuba, but it hasn't been successful. The average person now knows the sanctions are also b.s. because they know that if their relatives send them money they can buy stuff that Castro says the embargo keeps out, at the tourist stores. Castro knows his system failed and that's why he opened it up and let cuban citizens ask relatives for money. If you're like my dad who has his whole family over there, how do you let your siblings starve or not send him a water pump so he can irrigate his fields, because the one he's had for 30 years crapped out and parts don't exist for it. Is it a little better now? Yeah, because currency that actually is worth something is moving through the island and for those that have no relatives abroad, there's a black market the government has had to turn a blind eye to, so they can survive. Cuba isn't better today, it's that those that knew what life was like before are either gone or have died off. The 1994 rafter crisis probably saw the last of those people leave. The people today are the "hijos de la revolution" the children of the revolution. They've never known anything else. They don't know what freedom is. They're too preoccupied with find the handful of beans and rice they're going to eat that night to worry about anything else. The Castros knew that as long as they were preoccupied with finding the table scraps they got, they were going to behave.

Easing of sanctions under Obama, only made things worse for the average Cuban
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/world/americas/cuba-fidel-castro-food-tourism.html
 
You’ve actually piqued my interest. No real point in debating who correctly interprets a 3,000 year old moral code based on fairytales, run of the mill holocaust denial or the geopolitical basis for the founding of Israel - with you (especially here). Pretty sure neither one of us is going to change the others mind (we both think the other is thoroughly “brainwashed,” so there likely won’t be much middle ground). I just wanted to confirm, to myself, that I could reel you in with a tiny piece of bait (mission accomplished).

That said, I am curious how you’ve come to the conclusion that people who use “big words” are not just humans. Or is it just me, and my motives (whatever those may be), specifically? Also, what game are we playing that I can’t win? Those, at least, are novel arguments.

****...Calvin went from mildly annoying troll to communist pos antisemite real fast
 
Advertisement
165.gif
 
If you think you baited me, have at it, the Truth is the Truth. Not trying to convince you of anything, i just stated the facts about Fidel, who was an Atheist, but as he stated something to the affect of, "one does not have to believe in religion to have high moral principles". EL Commadante did what alot of religious hypocrites fail or claim they want to do, He fed the hungry, housed the homeless, clothe the naked, and provided for the sick! These are the facts, now under what type of government is your issue but the question i have for you, was Cuba a better, stronger and more properous nation before Castro took over, and what type of government was in place before Fidel, did they have the better interest of and for Cuba at heart!

Funny word, “truth.” One of those whose meaning is oft misapplied. Because it sure seems that whatever it is you believe to be true is diametrically opposed to what 99% of the rest of the world believes is so. Are we all crazy? Maybe, but Occam wouldn’t think so.

Not sure why I keep going, but, again, what does this “now under what type of government is your issue” mean? I can sort of make out your point - and my answer would be I have an issue with any junta-led dictatorship devoid of personal freedom. Marxism, in a diluted sense, can/has worked (ie postwar Northern European social-democracies). That’s not what el commandante practiced.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top