- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Messages
- 21
Pretty common knowledge. You don't have to scroll too far back to find them.
You're going to fix a lot with your programmatic problems discussion. To some it just seems like your crying into your *** rag. But that's just my opinion....Cool. More fun to chase pretend trolls with RVA on the other thread then have a discussion on programmatic problems and solutions. Enjoy.
Thanks for that then. We can just keep watching old 30 for 30's instead then I guess.You're going to fix a lot with your programmatic problems discussion. To some it just seems like your crying into your *** rag. But that's just my opinion....
Maybe so....Thanks for that then. We can just keep watching old 30 for 30's instead then I guess.
We just have a bunch of idiots running our program and it has been going on for a long timeI think we can spend but you are correct that if money is not well spent it will not make a difference.
Simple. Money is not an issue.
The same poor Miami has 5 national championships and could have won several others. How many would they have if Butch never left or a real coach was hired over Coker....we probably are not even having this conversation.
Miami has plenty of money, they just lack conviction.
We have the talent, the facilities, and a great fan base; we need competent coaches that turn talent into players! UCF and others have competent coaches and play to their strengths. Pretty easy!I know this is perhaps an unpopular topic, but I think it's the heart of the whole issue. Alabama has always done it under Saban and UGA and CU have recently followed suit since 2014. As I watch The Semenholes operate since the Norvell hire I really believe that modern college football requires so much money from administration and boosters, legitimate spending and even more so illegitimate, we are not willing - or perhaps more aptly - able to compete at that level. We simply do not have deep enough pockets to consistently win at 1. recruiting 2. facilities 3. coaching hires, etc. that we will forever be at such a disadvantage that hoping for more than a run to 10 wins every 3-5 years to unrealistic. As I said in the other thread, the return of a Terry/Wilson is eerily similiar to last years Lawrence/Wilkins, etc returns to Clemson that it tells me they have decided to go all in. I wish that we would or could as well. Thoughts?